ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gavriely, N
Right arrow Articles by Rubin, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gavriely, N
Right arrow Articles by Rubin, A.
Eur Respir J 1994; 7: 35-42
Copyright © ERS Journals Ltd 1994


Original Articles

Respiratory health screening using pulmonary function tests and lung sound analysis

N Gavriely, M Nissan, DW Cugell, and AH Rubin

Lung sounds (LS) analysis is a potential source of additional objective, noninvasive and quantitative information on the status of the pulmonary system. We have examined the hypothesis that the addition of lung sounds analysis to spirometry increases the sensitivity of objective population screening, as compared to the use of spirometry alone. Questionnaires, spirometry and lung sounds were obtained in 493 active workers. Lung sounds analysis consisted of the averaged power spectra of breath sounds, measured separately during inspiration and expiration at four standard locations over the trachea and the chest-wall. Of the 493 subjects, 91 had an obstructive lung disease, including 27 with chronic bronchitis identified by a history of prolonged cough and sputum production but with normal spirometry. Twelve additional workers had a restrictive lung disease. Abnormal spirometric results were found in 74 of the patients. Abnormal lung sounds analyses were found in 54 patients, including 14 of the chronic bronchitis cases, so that the overall sensitivity of objective screening tests increased from 71% to 87% by combining the two tests. Thirty three of the subjects considered normal by evaluation of their questionnaire and spirometry had abnormal lung sounds. Of the twenty four who were re-evaluated 12-18 months after the first tests, three had developed a lung or heart disease. We conclude that the combination of spirometry and lung sounds analysis significantly increased the sensitivity of detection of pulmonary diseases by objective tests, and provided an early sign of lung disease that was not detected by spirometry alone.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. Yigla, M. Gat, J.-J. Meyer, P. J. Friedman, T. M. Maher, and J. M. Madison
Vibration Response Imaging Technology in Healthy Subjects
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2008; 191(3): 845 - 852.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
J. A. Fiz, R. Jane, D. Salvatella, J. Izquierdo, L. Lores, P. Caminal, and J. Morera
Analysis of Tracheal Sounds During Forced Exhalation in Asthma Patients and Normal Subjects: Bronchodilator Response Effect
Chest, September 1, 1999; 116(3): 633 - 638.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
H. PASTERKAMP, S. S. KRAMAN, and G. R. WODICKA
Respiratory Sounds . Advances Beyond the Stethoscope
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., September 1, 1997; 156(3): 974 - 987.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1994 by the European Respiratory Society.