HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Supplementary information All Versions of this Article: 33/6/1329    most recent 09031936.00139608v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Permissions Request Permissions Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Google Scholar Articles by Dellacà, R. L. Articles by Calverley, P. M. A. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Dellacà, R. L. Articles by Calverley, P. M. A.

Effect of bronchodilation on expiratory flow limitation and resting lung mechanics in COPD

¹ TBM Lab, Dipartimento di Bioingegneria, Politecnico di Milano University, Milano, Italy. ² University Hospital Aintree, University Dept of Medicine, Liverpool, UK.

CORRESPONDENCE: R. L. Dellacà, Dipartimento di Bioingegneria, Politecnico di Milano, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32, I-20133 Milano, Italy. Fax: 39 0223999000. E-mail: raffaele.dellaca{at}polimi.it

Keywords: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, forced oscillation technique, respiratory system reactance, within-breath impedance

Received: September 10, 2008
Accepted December 29, 2008

Bronchodilator drugs produce variable improvements in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV₁), but larger changes in end-expiratory lung volume (EELV) in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), which were suggested to be related to the presence of expiratory flow limitation (EFL) at rest.

We tested this concept in 42 COPD patients (FEV₁ 42.3±13.8% predicted) during spontaneous breathing before and after 5 mg nebulised salbutamol. EFL was detected by within-breath changes in respiratory system reactance measured by a multifrequency forced oscillation method, while changes in EELV were assessed by inspiratory capacity (IC). Bronchodilation (BD) increased IC (from 1.8±0.5 to 2.1±0.6 L, p<0.001) and reduced inspiration resistance (_insp) at 5 Hz (from 5.1±1.6 to 4.2±1.5 cmH₂O·s·L^–1, p<0.001). _insp identified BD responders with a discriminative power of 80.1%.

In total, 20 patients were flow-limited before BD. They showed worse spirometry and higher residual volume, but significant improvements in IC were seen in all patients irrespective of flow limitation. Changes in _insp were confined to flow-limited patients, as were reactance changes. BD reduced the degree of heterogeneity in the respiratory system, a change best seen with inspiratory values.

BD has complex effects on lung mechanics in COPD, and EFL affects both this and the response of some respiratory variables to treatment. However, changes in EELV are consistently seen, irrespective of the presence of flow limitation at rest.