ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Permissions
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Whipp, B. J.
Right arrow Articles by Ward, S. A.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Whipp, B. J.
Right arrow Articles by Ward, S. A.
Eur Respir J 2009; 33:1254-1260
Copyright ©ERS Journals Ltd 2009

Quantifying intervention-related improvements in exercise tolerance

B. J. Whipp and S. A. Ward

Human Bio-Energetics Research Centre, Crickhowell, Powys, UK.

CORRESPONDENCE: B. J. Whipp, Human Bio-Energetics Research Centre, New Road, Crickhowell, Powys, NP8 1AT, UK. E-mail: bjwhipp{at}dsl.pipex.com

Keywords: Critical power, endurance test, power–duration relationship, therapeutic intervention, tolerance time

Received: July 20, 2008
Accepted February 2, 2009

Among the benefits expected to result from a therapeutic intervention in patients with impaired systemic functioning is an increase in exercise tolerance. For this a constant high-intensity work rate has been shown to provide a more sensitive index of improvement than the maximum work rate, or oxygen uptake, on a symptom-limited incremental test.

However, the extremely large variability of the improvement in this particular index of tolerance undermines the ability to make general inferences for the underlying functional improvement. We argue that this is a necessary consequence of the particular work rate chosen for the test and the change in the parameters of the subject's hyperbolic power–duration relationship for that form of exercise: its "critical power" and "curvature constant".

Without knowledge of these features, any absolute or per cent increase in tolerance time to a single constant-load exercise bout must be interpreted with caution regarding the physiological benefit(s) that have accrued from the intervention.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by the European Respiratory Society.