HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 32/5/1321    most recent 09031936.00165607v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Permissions Request Permissions Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Web of Science (1) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Burgers, J. A. Articles by van den Heuvel, M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Burgers, J. A. Articles by van den Heuvel, M.

Pleural drainage and pleurodesis: implementation of guidelines in four hospitals

¹ Netherlands Cancer Institute, ² Medical Centre of the Free University, ³ Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, ⁴ Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, and ⁵ Dutch Institute for Healthcare Improvement CBO, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

CORRESPONDENCE: J. A. Burgers, Dept of Thoracic Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Fax: 31 205122572. E-mail: s.burgers{at}nki.nl

Keywords: Guidelines, malignant pleurisy, pleurodesis, predictive factors, talc

Received: December 7, 2007
Accepted June 22, 2008

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the implementation of the 2003 Dutch guideline on the diagnosis and treatment of malignant pleural effusions, and the potential effect of the implementation on the clinical outcome of pleurodesis.

All patients with malignant pleural effusion who had a pleural drain placed with the intention of performing pleurodesis were registered prospectively in four centres. Details of the procedure and fluid recurrence and survival data were noted.

Patients with a proven malignancy (n = 100) were entered into the registration database. Diagnostic guideline recommendations were followed in 60–70% of the patients. Surprisingly, pleurodesis was performed in only 75% of the patients, mainly due to the presence of a trapped lung. All pleurodeses were performed using talc, according to the guideline. Follow-up revealed fluid recurrence in 27 (36%) patients after a mean follow-up of 17 days (range 2–285 days); 14 patients with successful pleurodesis died with a median survival of 61 days (range 13–174 days). Systemic treatment following pleurodesis and good apposition of the pleural surfaces during drainage were good prognostic factors.

Despite reasonable-to-good adherence to the guideline, the number of successful pleurodeses was low. Better predictors of a good pleurodesis outcome are needed.