HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Normand, H. Articles by Mouadil, A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Normand, H. Articles by Mouadil, A.

Clinical evaluation of a screen pneumotachograph as an in-line filter

¹ Faculty of Medicine, Physiology Dept, UPRES-EA 3917, University of Caen, ² Functional Testing Dept, and ³ Hygiene Dept, University Hospital of Caen, Caen, and ⁴ Functional Testing Dept, University Hospital of Brest, Brest, France.

CORRESPONDENCE: H. Normand, Faculty of Medicine, Physiology Dept, UPRES-EA 3917, Avenue de la Côte de Nacre, University of Caen, 14032 Caen, France. Fax: 33 231064871. E-mail: normand-h{at}chu-caen.fr

Keywords: Cross infection, prevention and control, respiratory function tests, respiratory tract infections

Received: December 16, 2005
Accepted June 22, 2006

The American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society Task Force underlined that the use of in-line filters during respiratory function tests "is an area of controversy". The aim of the present study was to measure the contamination occurring during forced expiration downstream from a screen pneumotachograph (SP) with and without an in-line filter (Pall PF30S). A total of 40 healthy subjects performed eight consecutive maximal expiratory manoeuvres into four sterile apparatuses (A1: no filter, no SP; A2: filter-only; A3: SP-only; A4: filter and SP) in random order. A blood agar plate was fixed downstream from the apparatus. Colony-forming units (CFUs) were counted after 24 h incubation at 37°C. Of the 40 plates obtained with each apparatus, 13 were sterile with A1 (range 0–679 CFUs), 25 with A2 (0–49 CFUs), 30 with A3 (0–35 CFUs) and 39 with A4 (one CFU in the only positive plate). A1 versus A2 and also A3 versus A4 gave different values for the CFU number, but A2 and A3 showed similar contamination levels.

The authors conclude that: 1) the in-line filter does not perform better than a screen pneumotachograph; 2) it does not eliminate the need to decontaminate the pneumotachograph; and 3) equipment placed downstream from an in-line filter and a screen pneumotachograph is almost protected from contamination.