|
|
||||||||
1 Respiratory Intensive Care Unit, S. Maugeri Foundation, Scientific Institute of Pavia, Pavia, 2 Respiratory Intensive Care Unit, Poma Hospital, Mantua, 4 Statistician QBGROUP, Padua, and 6 Respiratory Intensive Care Unit, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy. 3 Respiratory Intensive Care Unit, Social Medical Centre, Vienna, Austria. 5 Respiratory Intensive Care Unit, Marius Nasta National Institute of Pneumology, Bucharest, Romania. 7 Academic Dept of Sleep and Breathing, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK.
CORRESPONDENCE: S. Nava, Respiratory Intensive Care Unit, Fondazione S.Maugeri, I.R.C.C.S., Istituto Scientifico di Pavia, Via Maugeri 10, 27100 Pavia, Italy. Fax: 39 382592075. E-mail: snava{at}fsm.it
Keywords: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, end-of-life decisions, end-stage respiratory diseases, ethics, noninvasive mechanical ventilation respiratory intermediate care unit, survey
Received: October 2, 2006
Accepted February 14, 2007
A survey was performed on behalf of the European Respiratory Society to assess end-of-life practices in patients admitted to European respiratory intermediate care units and high dependency units over a 6-month period.
A 33-item questionnaire was sent by e-mail to physicians throughout Europe and the response rate was 28 (29.5%) out of 95. A total of 6,008 patients were admitted and an end-of-life decision was taken in 1,292 (21.5%). The mortality rate in these patients was 68% (884 out of 1,292).
The patients received similar proportions of withholding of treatment (298 (23%) out of 1292), do-not-resuscitate or do-not-intubate orders (442 (34%) out of 1,292) and noninvasive mechanical ventilation as the ceiling of ventilatory care (402 (31%) out of 1,292). Withdrawal of therapy was employed in 149 (11%) out of 1,292 patients and euthanasia in one. Do-not-intubate/do-not-resuscitate orders were more frequently used in North compared with South Europe. All of the 473 competent patients directly participated in the decision, whereas, in 722 (56%) out of 1,292 cases, decision-making was reported to be shared with the nurses.
In European respiratory intermediate care units and high dependency units, an end-of-life decision is taken for 21.5% of patients admitted. Withholding of treatment, do-not-intubate/do-not-resuscitate orders and noninvasive mechanical ventilation as the ventilatory care ceiling are the most common procedures. Competent patients are often involved, together with nurses.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. M. Clini and N. Ambrosino Nonpharmacological treatment and relief of symptoms in COPD Eur. Respir. J., July 1, 2008; 32(1): 218 - 228. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Chatwin, S. Heather, A. Hanak, M. I. Polkey, B. Wilson, and A. K. Simonds Analysis of emergency helpline support for home ventilator dependent patients: risk management and workload Eur. Respir. Rev., April 1, 2008; 17(107): 33 - 35. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Schonfeld and J-F. Timsit Overcoming a stigma: the lung cancer patient in the intensive care unit Eur. Respir. J., January 1, 2008; 31(1): 3 - 5. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Singh Need to prioritise: end-of-life decision-making in India Eur. Respir. J., January 1, 2008; 31(1): 222 - 223. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |