ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kesten, S
Right arrow Articles by Rebuck, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kesten, S
Right arrow Articles by Rebuck, A.
Eur Respir J 1990; 3: 498-501
Copyright © ERS Journals Ltd 1990


Original Articles

Ventilatory effects of nasal continuous positive airway pressure

S Kesten and AS Rebuck

Nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) improved arterial oxygenation in patients with sleep apnoea as well as those with acute pulmonary processes such as Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia. Despite an expanding pool of clinical information, little if any attempt seems to have been made to see whether nCPAP alters ventilatory patterns. The effect of nCPAP was assessed by respiratory inductance plethysmography in 14 healthy males. nCPAP reduced respiratory rate (14.3 +/- 1.47 to 9.7 +/- 1.98, p less than 0.0001) but increased tidal volume (0.483 +/- 0.090 to 0.602 +/- 0.140 l, p = 0.01). Accordingly, minute ventilation decreased (6.91 +/- 1.20 to 5.64 +/- 0.93 l.min-1, p = 0.0002). Duty cycle (TI/TTOT) decreased from 0.43 +/- 0.04 to 0.35 +/- 0.05 s during nCPAP (p less than 0.0001). Mean inspiratory time and mean expiratory time increased with nCPAP (1.79 +/- 0.19 to 2.20 +/- 0.41 and 2.44 +/- 0.38 to 4.27 +/- 1.07 s, respectively, p less than 0.02), but there were no significant changes in mean inspiratory flow rate or partitioning of rib cage and abdominal/diaphragmatic contributions to tidal volume. We conclude that nCPAP effects ventilatory pattern in a manner similar to that described for expiratory threshold loading; that is, by decreasing respiratory frequency and minute ventilation. nCPAP does not appear to stimulate healthy subjects to increase their level of ventilation.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
A. Valipour, F. Schneider, W. Kossler, S. Saliba, and O. C. Burghuber
Heart rate variability and spontaneous baroreflex sequences in supine healthy volunteers subjected to nasal positive airway pressure
J Appl Physiol, December 1, 2005; 99(6): 2137 - 2143.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
L. Denehy and S. Berney
The use of positive pressure devices by physiotherapists
Eur. Respir. J., April 1, 2001; 17(4): 821 - 829.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1990 by the European Respiratory Society.