ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Permissions
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Eur Respir J 1990; 3: 163-170
Copyright © ERS Journals Ltd 1990


Clinical Trial

High-dose inhaled versus intravenous salbutamol combined with theophylline in severe acute asthma. Swedish Society of Chest Medicine

In a multicentre parallel group study we studied 176 adult patients (53% men) with severe acute asthma (peak expiratory flow (PEF), 15-50% of predicted values). The effect of two doses of inhaled salbutamol (0.15 mg.kg-1 x 2; 30 min apart) (n = 87) was compared with that of one dose of salbutamol given intravenously (5 micrograms.kg-1) (n = 89). There was a significantly larger increase in peak expiratory flow after the first inhaled dose in the group that received inhalation treatment than in the i.v. treated group (69 vs 41 l.min-1, p less than 0.05), but there was no difference in systemic side-effects between the groups. After the second inhaled dose there was a further increase in PEF, but also in systemic side-effects. These treatments were also compared in a cross-over study on 18 of the patients who returned with a second attack of severe acute asthma. The cross-over evaluation produced similar results, with a significantly larger increase in PEF after the first inhaled dose than after the i.v. treatment. Fifteen of the 18 patients found the inhalations more effective than the i.v. treatment. Theophylline (3-6 mg.kg-1) was infused i.v. 60 min after the start of salbutamol treatment, and a significant increase in PEF was observed in both groups. A correlation between the increase in PEF and the increase in plasma theophylline concentration was only found in the group that had received i.v. salbutamol.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ThoraxHome page
S. Aldington and R. Beasley
Asthma exacerbations {middle dot} 5: Assessment and management of severe asthma in adults in hospital
Thorax, May 1, 2007; 62(5): 447 - 458.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
J. Varon, R. E. Fromm Jr, and P. E. Marik
IV 2{beta} or Not 2{beta}, That Is the Question!
Chest, October 1, 2002; 122(4): 1116 - 1118.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
A. H. Travers, B. H. Rowe, S. Barker, A. Jones, and C. A. Camargo Jr
The Effectiveness of IV {beta}-Agonists in Treating Patients With Acute Asthma in the Emergency Department: A Meta-analysis
Chest, October 1, 2002; 122(4): 1200 - 1207.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ThoraxHome page
B J LIPWORTH
Revisiting interactions between hypoxaemia and {beta}2 agonists in asthma
Thorax, July 1, 2001; 56(7): 506 - 507.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Pharmacy PracticeHome page
H. W. Kelly
The Management of Acute Severe Asthma
Journal of Pharmacy Practice, April 1, 2001; 14(2): 91 - 107.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
CMAJHome page
Management of patients with asthma in the emergency department and in hospital
Can. Med. Assoc. J., November 1, 1999; 161(90111): s53 - 59.
[Full Text]


Home page
ChestHome page
C. L. Emerman, R. K. Cydulka, and E. R. McFadden
Comparison of 2.5 vs 7.5 mg of Inhaled Albuterol in the Treatment of Acute Asthma
Chest, January 1, 1999; 115(1): 92 - 96.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
I. Amirav and M. T. Newhouse
Metered-Dose Inhaler Accessory Devices in Acute Asthma: Efficacy and Comparison With Nebulizers: A Literature Review
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, September 1, 1997; 151(9): 876 - 882.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1990 by the European Respiratory Society.