ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print September 13, 2006, 10.1183/09031936.00108205
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Marra, A.
Right arrow Articles by Stamatis, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Marra, A.
Right arrow Articles by Stamatis, G.
Eur Respir J 2007; 29:117-126
Copyright ©ERS Journals Ltd 2007

Induction chemotherapy, concurrent chemoradiation and surgery for Pancoast tumour

A. Marra1, W. Eberhardt2, C. Pöttgen3, D. Theegarten4, S. Korfee2, T. Gauler2, M. Stuschke3 and G. Stamatis1

1 Dept of Thoracic Surgery and Endoscopy, Ruhrlandklinik, Depts of 2 Internal Medicine (Cancer Research), 3 Radiotherapy, and 4 Pathology, West German Cancer Center, University of Essen Medical School, Essen, Germany.

CORRESPONDENCE: A. Marra, Dept of Thoracic Surgery and Endoscopy, Ruhrlandklinik, Tueschener Weg 40, 45239 Essen, Germany. Fax: 49 2014332009. E-mail: alexmarra{at}yahoo.it

Keywords: Chemotherapy, lung cancer, neoadjuvant therapy, radiotherapy, surgery

Received: September 14, 2005
Accepted August 17, 2006

The traditional treatment of Pancoast tumour with local approaches (surgery, radiotherapy or a combination of both) leads to a poor outcome due to the high rate of incomplete resection and the lack of systemic control. The aim of the present prospective feasibility study was to determine whether a trimodality approach improves local control and survival.

Patients with stage IIB–IIIB Pancoast tumour received induction chemotherapy (three courses of split-dose cisplatin and etoposide or paclitaxel) followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (a course of cisplatin/etoposide combined with 45 Gy hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy). After restaging, eligible patients underwent surgery 4–6 weeks post-radiation.

A total of 31 consecutive patients with T3 (81%) or T4 (19%) Pancoast tumour were enrolled in the study. Induction chemoradiotherapy was completed in all patients without treatment-related deaths. Grade 3–4 toxicity was observed in 32% of cases. In total, 29 (94%) patients were eligible for surgery. Complete resection was achieved in 94% of patients. The post-operative mortality rate was 6.4% and major complications arose in 20.6% of the patients. The median survival was 54 months with 2- and 5-yr survival rates of 74 and 46%, respectively.

In conclusion, this intensive multimodality treatment of Pancoast tumour is feasible and improves local resectability rates and long-term survival as compared with historical series.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the European Respiratory Society.