ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dales, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Clinch, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dales, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Clinch, J.
Eur Respir J 2006; 28:319-322
Copyright ©ERS Journals Ltd 2006

Sex differences in the clinical presentation and management of airflow obstruction

R. E. Dales1, A. Mehdizadeh1, S. D. Aaron1, K. L. Vandemheen2 and J. Clinch2

1 Dept of Medicine, University of Ottawa, and, 2 Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Ottawa Health Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

CORRESPONDENCE: R. E. Dales, Division of Respirology, The Ottawa Hospital (General Campus), 501 Smyth Road, Box 211, Ottawa, Ontario K1H 8L6, Canada. Fax: 1 6137396266. E-mail: rdales{at}ohri.ca

Keywords: Airflow obstruction, clinical practice, sex, spirometry, treatment

Received: November 23, 2005
Accepted April 26, 2006

The aim of the present study was to explore differences in the clinical expression, clinical diagnoses and management of airway diseases in a primary-care setting.

Patients aged ≥35 yrs who had ever smoked were enrolled when they presented for any reason to one of eight rural primary-care practices. Respiratory symptom questionnaires and spirometry were administered. In total, 1,034 patients had acceptable and reproducible spirometry, of whom 550 (53%) were males and 484 (47%) were females.

Males smoked more than females (41.2 versus 29.2 pack-yrs) respectively, and were more likely to have a pre-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in one second/forced vital capacity <0.70 at 22.4 versus 11.8%, respectively. However, more females than males reported breathlessness (51.0 versus 42.8%, respectively), a prior diagnosis compatible with airflow obstruction and taking respiratory medications (23.4 versus 14.9%, respectively).

In conclusion, the current results suggest that females are more likely than males to report breathlessness and be prescribed respiratory medications independent of differences in the severity of airflow obstruction.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Proc Am Thorac SocHome page
L. J. Greaves and L. A. Richardson
Tobacco Use, Women, Gender, and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Are the Connections Being Adequately Made?
Proceedings of the ATS, December 1, 2007; 4(8): 675 - 679.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Proc Am Thorac SocHome page
P. G. Camp and S. M. Goring
Gender and the Diagnosis, Management, and Surveillance of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Proceedings of the ATS, December 1, 2007; 4(8): 686 - 691.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 ChestHome page
M. T. Dransfield, G. R. Washko, M. G. Foreman, R. S. J. Estepar, J. Reilly, and W. C. Bailey
Gender Differences in the Severity of CT Emphysema in COPD
Chest, August 1, 2007; 132(2): 464 - 470.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the European Respiratory Society.