|
 |
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
Copyright ©ERS Journals Ltd 2006
Should forced expiratory volume in six seconds replace forced vital capacity to detect airway obstruction?
Division of Respiratory and Critical Care Physiology and Medicine, Dept of Medicine, Los Angeles Biomedical Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA, USA.
CORRESPONDENCE: J. E. Hansen, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Box 405, 1000 W. Carson Street, Torrance, CA 90509, USA. Fax: 1 3103289849. E-mail: jhansen{at}labiomed.org
Keywords: Airway obstruction, cigarette smoking, forced expiratory volume in six seconds, forced expiratory volume in three seconds, forced vital capacity, spirometry
Received: November 22, 2005
Accepted January 25, 2006
It has been suggested that forced expiratory volume in six seconds (FEV6) should be substituted for forced vital capacity (FVC) to measure fractions of timed expired volume for airflow obstruction detection. The present authors hypothesised that this recommendation might be questionable because flow after 6 s of forced expiration from more diseased lung units with the longest time constants was most meaningful and should not be ignored. Furthermore, previous studies comparing FEV6 and FVC included few subjects with mild or no disease.
The present study used spirometric data from the USA Third National Health and Nutrition Evaluation Survey with prior published ethnicity- and sex-specific equations for FEV1/FEV6, FEV1/FVC and FEV3/FVC, and new equations for FEV3/FEV6, all derived from
At 95% confidence intervals, 21.3% of 3,515 smokers and 41.3% of smokers aged >51 yrs had airway obstruction; when comparing FEV1/FEV6 with FEV1/FVC, 13.5% were concurrently abnormal, 1.5% were false positives and 4.1% were false negatives; and when comparing FEV3/FEV6 with FEV3/FVC, 11.6% were concurrently abnormal, 3.3% were false positives and 5.7% were false negatives.
Substituting forced expiratory volume in six seconds for forced vital capacity to determine the fractional rates of exhaled volumes reduces the sensitivity of spirometry to detect airflow obstruction, especially in older individuals and those with lesser obstruction.
4,000 adult never-smokers aged 20–80 yrs.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  J.-y. Jing, T.-c. Huang, W. Cui, F. Xu, and H.-h. Shen Should FEV1/FEV6 Replace FEV1/FVC Ratio To Detect Airway Obstruction?: A Metaanalysis Chest, April 1, 2009; 135(4): 991 - 998. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E. Derom, C. van Weel, G. Liistro, J. Buffels, T. Schermer, E. Lammers, E. Wouters, and M. Decramer Primary care spirometry Eur. Respir. J., January 1, 2008; 31(1): 197 - 203. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 V Bellia, C Sorino, F Catalano, G Augugliaro, N Scichilone, R Pistelli, C Pedone, and R Antonelli-Incalzi Validation of FEV6 in the elderly: correlates of performance and repeatability Thorax, January 1, 2008; 63(1): 60 - 66. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 B. Lamprecht, L. Schirnhofer, F. Tiefenbacher, B. Kaiser, S. A. Buist, M. Studnicka, and P. Enright Six-Second Spirometry for Detection of Airway Obstruction: A Population-based Study in Austria Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., September 1, 2007; 176(5): 460 - 464. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. E. Hansen, X.-G. Sun, and K. Wasserman Spirometric Criteria for Airway Obstruction: Use Percentage of FEV1/FVC Ratio Below the Fifth Percentile, Not < 70% Chest, February 1, 2007; 131(2): 349 - 355. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Vandevoorde and M. Swanney Is forced expiratory volume in six seconds a valid alternative to forced vital capacity? Eur. Respir. J., December 1, 2006; 28(6): 1288 - 1289. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Hansen, X-G. Sun, and K. Wasserman From the authors Eur. Respir. J., December 1, 2006; 28(6): 1289 - 1290. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |