ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Eaton, T.
Right arrow Articles by West, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Eaton, T.
Right arrow Articles by West, T.
Eur Respir J 2006; 27:697-704
Copyright ©ERS Journals Ltd 2006

Short-burst oxygen therapy for COPD patients: a 6-month randomised, controlled study

T. Eaton1, W. Fergusson1, J. Kolbe2, C. A. Lewis1 and T. West1

1 Respiratory Services, Auckland City Hospital, and 2 Dept of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.

CORRESPONDENCE: T. Eaton, Respiratory Services, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland 1, New Zealand. Fax: 64 96310712. E-mail: teaton{at}adhb.govt.nz

Keywords: Acute healthcare utilisation, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, health-related quality of life, randomised controlled, short-burst oxygen therapy

Received: August 22, 2005
Accepted December 6, 2005

Short-burst oxygen therapy (SBOT) remains widely advocated for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), despite a lack of supporting evidence. The aim of this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group study was to determine whether SBOT improves health-related quality of life (HRQL) or reduces acute healthcare utilisation in patients discharged following an acute exacerbation of COPD.

Consecutive patients were screened; 78 of 331 were eligible for randomisation to cylinder oxygen, cylinder air or usual care following discharge. Patients were elderly with high acute healthcare utilisation, forced expiratory volume in one second of <1 L and had dyspnoea limiting daily activity but were not hypoxaemic at rest. Over the 6-month study period, there were no significant differences between patient groups in HRQL (Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire (CRQ), 36-item Short-Form Health Survey, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) except for CRQ emotion domain. There were no significant differences in acute healthcare utilisation. Time to readmission was greatest in the usual care group. Cylinder use was high initially, but rapidly fell to very low levels within weeks in both cylinder oxygen and air groups.

In conclusion, the availability of short-burst oxygen therapy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients discharged from hospital following an acute exacerbation did not improve health-related quality of life or reduce acute healthcare utilisation. These results provide no support for the widespread use of short-burst oxygen therapy.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
P. Albert and P. M. A. Calverley
Drugs (including oxygen) in severe COPD
Eur. Respir. J., May 1, 2008; 31(5): 1114 - 1124.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
T. J. Wilt, D. Niewoehner, R. MacDonald, and R. L. Kane
Management of Stable Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Systematic Review for a Clinical Practice Guideline
Ann Intern Med, November 6, 2007; 147(9): 639 - 653.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DTBHome page
Why prescribe short-burst oxygen?
DTB, September 1, 2007; 45(9): 70 - 72.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JRSMHome page
D. A Seamark, C. J Seamark, and D. M G Halpin
Palliative care in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a review for clinicians
J R Soc Med, May 1, 2007; 100(5): 225 - 233.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the European Respiratory Society.