|
|
||||||||
1 Rehabilitation Centre Breda, 5 Depts of Pulmonology and 6 Physiotherapy VU University Medical Centre, 4 Faculty of Human Movement Sciences, and 2 Institute for Fundamental and Clinical Human Movement Science, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. 3 Dept of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Kinesiology and Rehabilitation Sciences, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium.
CORRESPONDENCE: A. van 't Hul, Rehabilitation Centre Breda, Brabantlaan 1, 4817 JW Breda, the Netherlands. Fax: 31 765331790. E-mail: a.vanthul{at}rcbreda.nl
Keywords: Assisted ventilation, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, exercise, pulmonary rehabilitation
Received: March 27, 2005
Accepted September 22, 2005
This study evaluates the effects of training with noninvasive ventilatory support in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in a randomised, controlled, observer-blinded trial.
Twenty-nine patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and with a ventilatory limited exercise capacity (forced expiratory volume in one second <60% predicted, breathing reserve at maximal exercise <20% of maximally voluntary ventilation, resting arterial oxygen tension
Statistically significant between-group differences were found in favour of the inspiratory pressure support of 10 cmH2O group for improvement in shuttle walking distance (16±17 versus 3±13%), cycle endurance (164±124 versus 88±128%), and the reduction in minute ventilation during exercise (-11±10 versus -2±9%).
It was concluded that exercise training with inspiratory pressure support of 10 cmH2O resulted in statistically significantly larger improvements in exercise performance than training with inspiratory pressure support of 5 cmH2O in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease suffering from a ventilatory limited exercise capacity. Inspiratory pressure support of 10 cmH2O may be considered as adjunct during high-intensity exercise training.
8 kPa (60 mmHg), end-exercise arterial oxygen saturation measured by pulse oximetry
85%) completed an 8-week supervised outpatient cycle exercise programme. Fourteen patients were randomised to training with inspiratory pressure support of 10 cmH2O and 15 patients to training with control (sham) inspiratory pressure support of 5 cmH2O. Outcome measures were the incremental shuttle walking test and a constant-load cycle endurance test at 75% of peak work rate including the measurement of physiological responses, and health status measured using the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. M. Clini and N. Ambrosino Nonpharmacological treatment and relief of symptoms in COPD Eur. Respir. J., July 1, 2008; 32(1): 218 - 228. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. M. Romer and M. I. Polkey Exercise-induced respiratory muscle fatigue: implications for performance J Appl Physiol, March 1, 2008; 104(3): 879 - 888. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. E. Dolmage and R. S. Goldstein Effects of One-Legged Exercise Training of Patients With COPD Chest, February 1, 2008; 133(2): 370 - 376. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Dreher, J. H. Storre, and W. Windisch Noninvasive ventilation during walking in patients with severe COPD: a randomised cross-over trial Eur. Respir. J., May 1, 2007; 29(5): 930 - 936. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. L. Ries, G. S. Bauldoff, B. W. Carlin, R. Casaburi, C. F. Emery, D. A. Mahler, B. Make, C. L. Rochester, R. ZuWallack, and C. Herrerias Pulmonary Rehabilitation: Joint ACCP/AACVPR Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines Chest, May 1, 2007; 131(5_suppl): 4S - 42S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Bianchi Training and ventilatory assistance in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Eur. Respir. J., May 1, 2006; 27(5): 1074 - 1074. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. van 't Hul and R. Gosselink From the authors Eur. Respir. J., May 1, 2006; 27(5): 1074 - 1075. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Ambrosino Assisted ventilation as an aid to exercise training: a mechanical doping? Eur. Respir. J., January 1, 2006; 27(1): 3 - 5. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |