ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bernardi, L.
Right arrow Articles by Cogo, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bernardi, L.
Right arrow Articles by Cogo, A.
Eur Respir J 2006; 27:165-171
Copyright ©ERS Journals Ltd 2006

Hypoxic ventilatory response in successful extreme altitude climbers

L. Bernardi1, A. Schneider2, L. Pomidori3, E. Paolucci3 and A. Cogo3

1 Dept of Internal Medicine, University of Pavia and IRCCS Ospedale S. Matteo, Pavia, and 3 Dept of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Section of Respiratory Diseases, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy. 2 Dept of Anaesthesiology, University Medical Center, Regensburg, Germany

CORRESPONDENCE: L. Bernardi, Clinica Medica 2, Universita' di Pavia - IRCCS Ospedale S. Matteo, 27100 Pavia, Italy. Fax: 39 0382526259. E-mail: lbern1ps{at}unipv.it

Keywords: Altitude, hypoxia, ventilation, ventilatory control, ventilatory efficiency

Received: February 11, 2005
Accepted September 2, 2005

A very high ventilatory response to hypoxia is believed necessary to reach extreme altitude without oxygen. Alternatively, the excessive ventilation could be counterproductive by exhausting the ventilatory reserve early on.

To test these alternatives, 11 elite climbers (2004 Everest-K2 Italian Expedition) were evaluated as follows: 1) at sea level, and 2) at 5,200 m, after 15 days of acclimatisation at altitude. Resting oxygen saturation, minute ventilation, breathing rate, hypoxic ventilatory response, maximal voluntary ventilation, ventilatory reserve (at oxygen saturation = 70%) and two indices of ventilatory efficiency were measured.

Everest and K2 summits were reached 29 and 61 days, respectively, after the last measurement. Five climbers summited without oxygen, the other six did not, or succeeded with oxygen (two climbers). At sea level, all data were similar. At 5,200 m, the five summiters without oxygen showed lower resting minute ventilation, breathing rate and ventilatory response to hypoxia, and higher ventilatory reserve and ventilatory efficiency, compared to the other climbers.

Thus, the more successful climbers had smaller responses to hypoxia during acclimatisation to 5,200 m, but, as a result, had greater available reserve for the summit. A less sensitive hypoxic response and a greater ventilatory efficiency might increase ventilatory reserve and allow sustainable ventilation in the extreme hypoxia at the summit.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
P. N. Ainslie, A. Barach, K. J. Cummings, C. Murrell, M. Hamlin, and J. Hellemans
Cardiorespiratory and cerebrovascular responses to acute poikilocapnic hypoxia following intermittent and continuous exposure to hypoxia in humans
J Appl Physiol, May 1, 2007; 102(5): 1953 - 1961.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the European Respiratory Society.