|
 |
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
Copyright ©ERS Journals Ltd 2005
What are the questionnaire items most useful in identifying subjects with occupational asthma?
1 Service de Pneumologie, Cliniques universitaires de Mont-Godinne, Université Catholique de Louvain, Yvoir, Belgium. 2 Dept of Chest Medicine, Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, Canada. 3 Hopital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain. 4 Salvatore Maugeri Foundation at Medical Centre of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
CORRESPONDENCE: J-L. Malo, Dept of Chest Medicine, Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, 5400 West Gouin Blvd W., Montreal, H4J 1C5, Canada. Fax: 1 5143383123. E-mail: malojl{at}meddir.umontreal.ca
Keywords: Asthma, bronchial diseases, occupational asthma, occupational diseases
Received: March 2, 2005
Accepted August 7, 2005
The present study assessed the usefulness of key items obtained from a clinical "open" questionnaire prospectively administered to 212 subjects, referred to four tertiary-care hospitals for predicting the diagnosis of occupational asthma (OA). Of these subjects, 72 (34%) were diagnosed as OA (53% with OA due to high-molecular-weight agents) according to results of specific inhalation challenges, and 90 (42%) as non-OA.
Wheezing at work occurred in 88% of subjects with OA and was the most specific symptom (85%). Nasal and eye symptoms were commonly associated symptoms. Wheezing, nasal and ocular itching at work were positively, and loss of voice negatively associated with the presence of OA in the case of high-, but not low molecular-weight agents.
A prediction model based on responses to nasal itching, daily symptoms over the week at work, nasal secretions, absence of loss of voice, wheezing, and sputum, correctly predicted 156 out of 212 (74%) subjects according to the presence or absence of OA by final diagnosis.
In conclusion, key items, i.e. wheezing, nasal and ocular itching and loss of voice, are satisfactorily associated with the presence of occupational asthma in subjects exposed to high-molecular-weight agents. Therefore, these should be addressed with high priority by physicians. However, no questionnaire-derived item is helpful in subjects exposed to low-molecular-weight agents.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  S. M. Tarlo, J.-L. Malo, and on behalf of the Third Jack Pepys Workshop on Asth An Official ATS Proceedings: Asthma in the Workplace: The Third Jack Pepys Workshop on Asthma in the Workplace: Answered and Unanswered Questions Proceedings of the ATS, August 1, 2009; 6(4): 339 - 349. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. M. Tarlo, J. Balmes, R. Balkissoon, J. Beach, W. Beckett, D. Bernstein, P. D. Blanc, S. M. Brooks, C. T. Cowl, F. Daroowalla, et al. Diagnosis and Management of Work-Related Asthma: American College of Chest Physicians Consensus Statement Chest, September 1, 2008; 134(3_suppl): 1S - 41S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. M. Barber, S. Naylor, L. Bradshaw, M. Francis, J. Harris-Roberts, R. Rawbone, A. Curran, D. Fishwick, and on behalf of the British Thoracic Society Research Facilities for investigating occupational asthma in UK non-specialist respiratory departments Occup. Med., January 1, 2008; 58(1): 71 - 73. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. Nawrot, A. Nemmar, and B. Nemery Update in environmental and occupational medicine 2005. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., May 1, 2006; 173(9): 948 - 952. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |