HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (5) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Duong, M. Articles by McEvoy, R. D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Duong, M. Articles by McEvoy, R. D.

Use of heated humidification during nasal CPAP titration in obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome

¹ Adelaide Institute for Sleep Health, South Australia, Australia and ² McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

CORRESPONDENCE: M. Duong, McMaster University, Health Science Centre, Room 3U24, Cardiorespiratory Research Unit, 1200 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8N 3Z5, Canada. Fax: 1 9055408803. E-mail: duongmy{at}mcmaster.ca

Keywords: Continuous positive airway pressure titration, heated humidification, nasopharyngeal side-effects, obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome, rhinomanometry, upper airway

Received: November 16, 2004
Accepted June 17, 2005

Nasal symptoms associated with the use of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) in obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) can adversely impact on patients' tolerance, acceptance and adherence to nCPAP therapy. Regular use of heated humidification is effective in alleviating these symptoms and improve patient comfort.

In a randomised, parallel, double-blinded, controlled study, the present authors examined the use of heated humidification during a single night laboratory nCPAP titration in untreated OSA patients and its effect on nasal symptoms, nasal airway resistance (NAR), effective pressure and treatment tolerability and acceptance.

Baseline characteristics of subjects (n = 70) receiving placebo and humidification were (mean±SEM): age 51.2±2.2 versus 50.6±1.6 yrs; body mass index 33.6±0.9 versus 35.2±0.9 kg·m^–2; Epworth Sleepiness Scale 10.8±1.0 versus 11.3±0.7; and apnoea-hypopnoea index 43.5±4.6 versus 44.4±4.1 events·h^–1. Total inspiratory NAR, before (0.36±0.09 (placebo) versus 0.33±0.09 kPa·L^–1·s^–1) and after nCPAP (0.47±0.11 versus 0.29±0.04 kPa·L^–1·s^–1) were not significantly different between the groups. No difference was found in the frequency and severity of nasopharyngeal symptoms, therapeutic pressure and subjective response to nCPAP.

In conclusion, heated humidification during the initial nasal continuous positive airway pressure titration offers no additional benefit in nasal physiology, symptoms or subjective response to nasal continuous positive airway pressure, and, therefore, should not be routinely recommended.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G. Nilius, U. Domanski, K-J. Franke, and K-H. Ruhle Impact of a controlled heated breathing tube humidifier on sleep quality during CPAP therapy in a cool sleeping environment Eur. Respir. J., April 1, 2008; 31(4): 830 - 836. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. E. Weaver and R. R. Grunstein Adherence to Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Therapy: The Challenge to Effective Treatment Proceedings of the ATS, February 15, 2008; 5(2): 173 - 178. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Nilius, A. Happel, U. Domanski, and K.-H. Ruhle Pressure-Relief Continuous Positive Airway Pressure vs Constant Continuous Positive Airway Pressure: A Comparison of Efficacy and Compliance. Chest, October 1, 2006; 130(4): 1018 - 1024. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]