HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (6) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Haughney, J. Articles by Löfdahl, C-G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Haughney, J. Articles by Löfdahl, C-G.

Exacerbations of COPD: quantifying the patient's perspective using discrete choice modelling

¹ University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, ² Imperial College, London, and ⁶ Adelphi Group Ltd, Macclesfield, UK. ³ Marburg University Hospital, Marburg, Germany. ⁴ AstraZeneca Research and Development, and ⁷ Lund University Hospital, Lund, Sweden. ⁵ Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.

CORRESPONDENCE: J. Haughney, Dept of General Practice and Primary Care, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill Health Centre, Westburn Road, Aberdeen, AB25 2AY, UK. Fax: 44 1355221738. E-mail: j.haughney{at}abdn.ac.uk

Keywords: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, discrete choice modelling, exacerbations, patient perceptions

Received: December 14, 2004
Accepted May 17, 2005

Patient-centred care is the current vogue in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), but it is only recently that robust techniques have become available to determine patients' values and preferences. In this international cross-sectional study, patients' concerns and expectations regarding COPD exacerbations were explored using discrete choice modelling.

A fractional factorial design was used to develop scenarios comprising a combination of levels for nine different attributes. In face-to-face interviews, patients were presented with paired scenarios and asked to choose the least preferable. Multinomial logit (with hierarchical Bayes) methods were used to estimate utilities. A total of 125 patients (82 males; mean age 66 yrs; 4.6 mean exacerbations·yr^–1) were recruited.

The attributes of exacerbations considered most important were impact on everyday life (20%), need for medical care (16%), number of future attacks (12%) and breathlessness (11%). The next most important attributes were speed of recovery, productive cough and social impact (all 9%), followed by sleep disturbance and impact on mood (both 7%). Importantly, analysis of utility shifts showed that patients most feared being hospitalised, housebound or bedridden. These issues were more important than symptom improvement.

Strategies for the clinical management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease should clearly address patients' concerns and focus on preventing and treating exacerbations to avoid these feared outcomes.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. A. Aspinall, Z. K. Johnson, A. Azuara-Blanco, A. Montarzino, R. Brice, and A. Vickers Evaluation of Quality of Life and Priorities of Patients with Glaucoma Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., May 1, 2008; 49(5): 1907 - 1915. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M Sridhar, R Taylor, S Dawson, N J Roberts, and M R Partridge A nurse led intermediate care package in patients who have been hospitalised with an acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Thorax, March 1, 2008; 63(3): 194 - 200. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Jones and T. Higenbottam Quantifying of Severity of Exacerbations in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Adaptations to the Definition to Allow Quantification Proceedings of the ATS, December 1, 2007; 4(8): 597 - 601. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]