ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mitchison, D. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mitchison, D. A.
Eur Respir J 2005; 25:376-379
Copyright ©ERS Journals Ltd 2005

Drug resistance in tuberculosis

D. A. Mitchison

Medical Microbiology, St George's Hospital Medical School, London, UK

CORRESPONDENCE: D. A. Mitchison, Medical Microbiology, St George's Hospital Medical School, Cranmer Terrace, London SW17 0RE, UK. Fax: 44 2086720234. E-mail: dmitchis@sghms.ac.uk

Keywords: Drug resistance, prognosis, tuberculosis

Received: June 23, 2004
Accepted July 13, 2004

ABSTRACT

A drug-resistant strain of Mycobacterium tuberculosis is defined as one differing from the tight distribution of wild strains that have not come into contact with the drug concerned.

Sensitivity tests are performed by the absolute concentration method, the resistance ratio method or the proportion method. The hypothesis underlying the proportion method is that there are appreciable differences in inoculum size so that there should be an association between the proportion on drug-free medium and the proportion on drug-containing medium. This hypothesis was not supported by a study on ethionamide-resistant strains. It indicated that variation in the proportion on drug-free medium was due to clumping of the bacilli in the inoculum rather than to differences in the number of bacilli.

Hence, the use of the proportion method introduces errors in susceptibility testing. While the method can produce reliable results, it is more time consuming than a minimal inhibitory concentration determination, and should not be adopted as a standard method.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
A. Martin, A. von Groll, K. Fissette, J. C. Palomino, F. Varaine, and F. Portaels
Rapid Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Resistance to Second-Line Drugs by Use of the Manual Mycobacterium Growth Indicator Tube System
J. Clin. Microbiol., December 1, 2008; 46(12): 3952 - 3956.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the European Respiratory Society.