HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (6) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Abdenbi, F. Articles by Escourrou, P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Abdenbi, F. Articles by Escourrou, P.

Bench testing of auto-adjusting positive airway pressure devices

Explorations Fonctionnelles Multidisciplinaires, Hôpital Antoine Béclère, Clamart, France.

CORRESPONDENCE: F. Abdenbi, Explorations Fonctionnelles Multidisciplinaires, Hôpital Antoine Béclère, 157 rue de la porte de Trivaux, 92140 Clamart, France. Fax: 33 145374828. E-mail: faycal.abdenbi@kb.u-psud.fr

Keywords: Automation, flow limitation, sleep apnoea syndromes, snoring, upper airway mechanics

Received: December 3, 2003
Accepted June 16, 2004

This work was supported by Réseau National des Technologies pour la Santé (RNTS) convention no. 014906028.

Continuous positive airway pressure devices are routinely used to treat sleep breathing disorders. Automated devices that adjust the therapeutic pressure have recently been proposed. The utility of such devices is still controversial, as rigorous clinical comparisons are difficult to perform as a result of patient and device differences.

The current authors studied automated devices in a respiratory model that was able to mimic upper airway mechanics and to interact with pressure adjustment in a closed loop. Five auto-adjusted devices were submitted to this model, in order to determine their ability to detect respiratory events and adjust pressure accordingly.

All apnoeas were suppressed, whilst the reaction to repetitive hypopnoeas was dependent on the airflow shape. In some devices, repetitive hypopnoeas were changed to flow limitation. Artificial snoring caused a pressure increase in four devices, and constant mask leak was not systematically compensated. Only one device did not raise pressure in response to central apnoeas with opened upper airways. These findings show that, in some devices, event classification failed and normal airflow was not fully restored, resulting in elevated residual event indices.

In conclusion, this model is useful in order to reproducibly compare diagnostic and therapeutic capacities of commercial devices as a first step, before costly clinical studies.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. E. Weaver and R. R. Grunstein Adherence to Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Therapy: The Challenge to Effective Treatment Proceedings of the ATS, February 15, 2008; 5(2): 173 - 178. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Pevernagie, J. F. Masa, J. C. Meurice, R. Farre, O. Marrone, and D. Rodenstein Treatment of obstructive sleep-disordered breathing with positive airway pressure systems Eur. Respir. Rev., December 1, 2007; 16(106): 125 - 131. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Lofaso, G. Desmarais, K. Leroux, V. Zalc, R. Fodil, D. Isabey, and B. Louis Bench evaluation of flow limitation detection by automated continuous positive airway pressure devices. Chest, August 1, 2006; 130(2): 343 - 349. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Rigau, J. M. Montserrat, H. Wohrle, D. Plattner, M. Schwaibold, D. Navajas, and R. Farre Bench model to simulate upper airway obstruction for analyzing automatic continuous positive airway pressure devices. Chest, August 1, 2006; 130(2): 350 - 361. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]