|
|
||||||||
1 Dept of Pneumology, University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, 2 North Sea Clinic Westerland, Westerland, and 3 Dept of Pneumology, Respiratory Intensive Care Unit and Sleep Laboratory, Evangelical Hospital Göttingen-Weende Incorporated Society, Bovenden-Lenglern, Germany
CORRESPONDENCE: W. Windisch, Dept of Pneumology, University Hospital Freiburg, Killianstraße 5, D-79106, Freiburg, Germany. Fax: 49 7612703704. E-mail: windisch@med1.ukl.uni-freiburg.de
Keywords: Muscle strength, normal values, reproducibility, respiratory failure, respiratory muscles, respiratory pressures
Received: December 8, 2003
Accepted December 22, 2003
There is no clear evidence as to how maximal inspiratory mouth pressure (PI,max) should be measured, although plateau pressures sustained for 1 s and measured at residual volume (RV) are usually recommended.
Peak and plateau PI,max were measured at RV and at functional residual capacity (FRC) in 533 healthy subjects (aged 1090 yrs) in order to comparably test all PI,max measurements for their predictors, reproducibility and normal values.
Plateau pressures accounted for 82.086.3% of peak pressures. Peak and plateau pressures measured at FRC accounted for 84.390.5% of pressures at RV, and were highly correlated. Age was negatively predictive and weight and body mass index positively predictive of PI,max, but regression parameters were low. All PI,max measurements were comparable when calculating regression parameters, between-subject variability and reproducibility.
In conclusion, peak and plateau maximal inspiratory mouth pressure are comparably useful for the assessment of inspiratory muscle strength and can be reliably measured at functional residual capacity and at residual volume. Regression equations are of low impact in predicting normal values due to the weak influence of demographic and anthropometric factors and to the high unexplained between-subject-variability. Age-related 5th percentiles can indicate the lower limit of the normal range.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Dreher, J. H. Storre, and W. Windisch Noninvasive ventilation during walking in patients with severe COPD: a randomised cross-over trial Eur. Respir. J., May 1, 2007; 29(5): 930 - 936. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-J. Kabitz, F. Lang, S. Walterspacher, S. Sorichter, J. Muller-Quernheim, and W. Windisch Impact of impaired inspiratory muscle strength on dyspnea and walking capacity in sarcoidosis. Chest, November 1, 2006; 130(5): 1496 - 1502. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Andreas, C. Herrmann-Lingen, T. Raupach, L. Luthje, J. A. Fabricius, N. Hruska, W. Korber, B. Buchner, C-P. Criee, G. Hasenfuss, et al. Angiotensin II blockers in obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomised controlled trial Eur. Respir. J., May 1, 2006; 27(5): 972 - 979. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Vitacca, M. Paneroni, L. Bianchi, E. Clini, A. Vianello, P. Ceriana, L. Barbano, B. Balbi, and S. Nava Maximal inspiratory and expiratory pressure measurement in tracheotomised patients Eur. Respir. J., February 1, 2006; 27(2): 343 - 349. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Windisch, S. Kostic, M. Dreher, J. C. Virchow Jr, and S. Sorichter Outcome of Patients With Stable COPD Receiving Controlled Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation Aimed at a Maximal Reduction of PaCO2 Chest, August 1, 2005; 128(2): 657 - 662. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Windisch, H.-J. Kabitz, and S. Sorichter Influence of Different Trigger Techniques on Twitch Mouth Pressure During Bilateral Anterior Magnetic Phrenic Nerve Stimulation Chest, July 1, 2005; 128(1): 190 - 195. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |