HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Corrado, A. Articles by Berni, G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Corrado, A. Articles by Berni, G.

Iron lung versus conventional mechanical ventilation in acute exacerbation of COPD

¹ Respiratory Intensive Care Unit, ² 1st General Intensive Care Unit, and ³ Emergency Room and Internal Medicine, Careggi Hospital

CORRESPONDENCE: A. Corrado, UTIP-Fisiopatologia Toracica, Careggi Hospital, CTO, Largo Palagi, 1, Florence, Italy. Fax: 39 0554277559. E-mail: acorrado@qubisoft.it

Keywords: acute on chronic respiratory failure, invasive mechanical ventilation, negative pressure ventilation, noninvasive mechanical ventilation, randomised trial

Received: March 17, 2003
Accepted September 10, 2003

The aim of this randomised study was to compare the effects of iron lung ventilation (ILV) with invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) in patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF) due to exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Forty-four patients with ARF were assigned either to ILV (22 patients) or IMV (22 patients). Primary end-points were the improvement in gas exchange and complications related to mechanical ventilation.

On admission ILV and IMV groups did not differ in age, simplified acute physiology score II, arterial oxygen tension (P_a,O2)/inspiratory oxygen fraction (F_I,O2), arterial carbon dioxide tension (P_a,CO2) and pH. Compared with baseline, ILV and IMV induced a similar and significant improvement in P_a,O2/F_I,O2, P_a,CO2 and pH after 1 h of treatment and at discontinuation of mechanical ventilation. Major complications tended to be more frequent in patients treated with IMV than in those treated with ILV (27.3% versus 4.5%), whereas mortality rate was similar (27.3% versus 18.2%). The ventilator-free days and the length of hospital stay were significantly lower in the ILV than in the IMV group.

This study suggests that iron lung ventilation is as effective as invasive mechanical ventilation in improving gas exchange in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients with acute respiratory failure, and is associated with a tendency towards a lower rate of major complications.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				N. Soni and P. Williams Positive pressure ventilation: what is the real cost? Br. J. Anaesth., October 1, 2008; 101(4): 446 - 457. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B Chakrabarti and P M A Calverley Management of acute ventilatory failure. Postgrad. Med. J., July 1, 2006; 82(969): 438 - 445. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Scala, M. Naldi, I. Archinucci, G. Coniglio, and S. Nava Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation in Patients With Acute Exacerbations of COPD and Varying Levels of Consciousness Chest, September 1, 2005; 128(3): 1657 - 1666. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]