|
|
||||||||
1 Dept of Clinical and Biological Sciences, University of Insubria, Varese-Circolo and Fondazione Macchi Hospital, Varese, Italy. 2 Institute of Anesthesia and Critical Care, University of Milano-Policlinico Hospital, IRCCS, Milano, Italy. 3 Dept of Pathology and 4 Division of Respiratory Diseases, University of Sao Paulo, School of Medicine, Sao Paulo, Brazil
CORRESPONDENCE: D. Chiumello, Institute of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Ospedale Policlinico IRCCS, Via F. Sforza 20122, Milano, Italy. Fax: 39 0255033230. E-mail: chiumello@libero.it
Keywords: computed tomography, positive end-expiratory pressure, prone position, pulmonary and extrapulmonary acute respiratory distress syndrome, respiratory mechanics, ventilator-induced lung injury
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) can be derived from two pathogenetic pathways: a direct insult on lung cells (pulmonary ARDS (ARDSp)) or indirectly (extrapulmonary ARDS (ARDSexp)). This review reports and discusses differences in biochemical activation, histology, morphological aspects, respiratory mechanics and response to different ventilatory strategies between ARDSp and ARDSexp. In ARDSp the direct insult primarily affects the alveolar epithelium with a local alveolar inflammatory response while in ARDSexp the indirect insult affects the vascular endothelium by inflammatory mediators through the bloodstream.
Radiological pattern in ARDSp is characterised by a prevalent alveolar consolidation while the ARDSexp by a prevalent ground-glass opacification. In ARDSp the lung elastance, while in ARDSexp the chest wall and intra-abdominal chest elastance are increased. The effects of positive end-expiratory pressure, recruitment manoeuvres and prone position are clearly greater in ARDSexp.
Although these two types of acute respiratory distress syndrome have different pathogenic pathways, morphological aspects, respiratory mechanics, and different response to ventilatory strategies, at the present, is still not clear, if this distinction can really ameliorate the outcome.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Krupa, M. J. Walencka, V. Shrivastava, T. Loyd, R. Fudala, C. W. Frevert, T. R. Martin, and A. K. Kurdowska Anti-KC Autoantibody:KC Complexes Cause Severe Lung Inflammation in Mice via IgG Receptors Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., November 1, 2007; 37(5): 532 - 543. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Fan, D. M. Needham, and T. E. Stewart Ventilatory Management of Acute Lung Injury and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome JAMA, December 14, 2005; 294(22): 2889 - 2896. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.J. Hoffmann Basic mechanisms of lung inflammation: executive summary of the first Lung Science Meeting of the European Respiratory Society at Taormina, Italy in 2003 Eur. Respir. J., September 20, 2003; 22(44_suppl): 1s - 3s. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |