ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Koskela, H.O.
Right arrow Articles by Pekkanen, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Koskela, H.O.
Right arrow Articles by Pekkanen, J.
Eur Respir J 2003; 22:135-140
Copyright ©ERS Journals Ltd 2003


Pet- and pollen-induced upper airway symptoms in farmers and in nonfarmers

H.O. Koskela1, K.K. Iivanainen2, S.T. Remes3 and J. Pekkanen2

1 Dept of Respiratory Medicine, Kuopio University Hospital, 2 Unit of Environmental Epidemiology, National Public Health Institute, 3 Dept of Paediatrics, Kuopio University Hospital and Unit of Environmental Epidemiology, National Public Health Institute, Kuopio, Finland

CORRESPONDENCE: H.O. Koskela, Dept of Respiratory Medicine, Kuopio University Hospital, PL 1777, 70210 Kuopio, Finland. Fax: 358 17172683. E-mail: heikki.koskela@kuh.fi

Keywords: epidemiology, farmers, rhinitis, skin-prick tests

Received: November 26, 2002
Accepted February 10, 2003

The effect of farming on the risk of upper airway symptoms is not clear. In this cross-sectional, population-based study, 198 female farmers, 50 nonfarmers living on a farm, and 218 nonfarmers not living on a farm, filled in a symptom questionnaire and underwent skin-prick testing with common and agricultural allergens. In the logistic regression analysis, the latter group served as a control. Several adjustments were made, including childhood farming environment.

Current farming was found to decrease the risks of pet- and pollen-induced upper airway symptoms, dose-dependently with the intensity and duration of animal husbandry. Including skin-test positivity to pets in the regression models did not affect the negative association between farming and pet-induced symptoms. In contrast, animal husbandry increased the risk of farm work-induced upper airway symptoms.

Animal husbandry often induces work-related upper airway symptoms. However, the present study among female adults suggests that it may also decrease the risk of pet- and pollen-induced upper airway symptoms.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
T. Skjold, R. Dahl, B. Juhl, and T. Sigsgaard
The incidence of respiratory symptoms and sensitisation in baker apprentices
Eur. Respir. J., August 1, 2008; 32(2): 452 - 459.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
H O Koskela, K K Happonen, S T Remes, and J Pekkanen
Effect of farming environment on sensitisation to allergens continues after childhood
Occup. Environ. Med., September 1, 2005; 62(9): 607 - 611.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the European Respiratory Society.