ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Santus, P.
Right arrow Articles by Centanni, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Santus, P.
Right arrow Articles by Centanni, S.
Eur Respir J 2003; 21:82-85
Copyright ©ERS Journals Ltd 2003

Bronchodilation test in COPD: effect of inspiratory manoeuvre preceding forced expiration

P. Santus1, M. Pecchiari2, P. Carlucci3, B. Boveri1, F. Di Marco1, F. Castagna1 and S. Centanni1

1 Institute of Lung Disease, Respiratory Unit, San Paolo Hospital, 2 Institute of Human Physiology I, and 3 Institute of Lung Disease, Policlinico Hospital IRCCS, University of Milan, Milan, Italy

CORRESPONDENCE: S. Centanni, Respiratory Unit, San Paolo Hospital, Via A. di Rudinì, 8, 20142, Milano, Italy. Fax: 39 0289123960. E-mail: stefano.centanni@unimi.it

Keywords: diagnosis, functional testing, spirometry, standardisation, treatment

Received: June 19, 2002
Accepted September 11, 2002

The effects of an inspiratory manoeuvre preceding forced expiration on functional tests performed under routine conditions before and after inhalation of a bronchodilator drug (salbutamol) were assessed on 150 consecutive chronic obstructive pulmonary disease outpatients. The patients performed forced vital capacity manoeuvres either immediately after a rapid inspiration (manoeuvre no. 1) or after a slow inspiration with a 4–6 s pause (manoeuvre no. 2).

Under baseline conditions, forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) values were 8% (% control) larger with manoeuvre no. 1 than no. 2. FEV1 values increased with salbutamol administration by ~8% and were, on average, still 7% larger with manoeuvre no. 1 than no. 2. The incidence of reversibility, assessed according to American Thoracic Society criteria, was 76% when manoeuvre no. 2 was selected to represent baseline conditions and manoeuvre no. 1 was chosen to represent the effects of bronchodilator administration, whereas the lowest incidence (2%) was found when manoeuvre no. 1 was selected to represent baseline conditions and manoeuvre no. 2 was chosen to represent the effects of bronchodilator administration.

These results indicate that the time dependence of the forced vital capacity manoeuvre has an important impact on the assessment of routine lung function in a clinical setting and supports the notion that the time course of the inspiration preceding the forced vital capacity manoeuvre should be standardised.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
P. Santus, A. Sola, P. Carlucci, F. Fumagalli, A. Di Gennaro, M. Mondoni, C. Carnini, S. Centanni, and A. Sala
Lipid Peroxidation and 5-Lipoxygenase Activity in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., April 15, 2005; 171(8): 838 - 843.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the European Respiratory Society.