ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (13)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baumgartner, R.A.
Right arrow Articles by Reiss, T.F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Baumgartner, R.A.
Right arrow Articles by Reiss, T.F.
Eur Respir J 2003; 21:123-128
Copyright ©ERS Journals Ltd 2003


Distribution of therapeutic response in asthma control between oral montelukast and inhaled beclomethasone

R.A. Baumgartner1, G. Martinez2, J.M. Edelman3, G.G. Rodriguez Gomez4, M. Bernstein5, S. Bird3, R. Angner1, A. Polis3, S.B. Dass1, S. Lu1 and T.F. Reiss1 for the Montelukast Asthma Study Group

1 Merck Research Laboratories, Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA. 2 Clinicas Medicas, Guatemala City, Guatemala. 3 United States Human Health, Merck & Co., Inc., Horsham, PA, USA. 4 Hospital Mexico, Instituto Costarricense de Investigaciones Clinicas, San Jose, Costa Rica. 5 Hospital de Clinical Caracas, Caracas, Venezeula

CORRESPONDENCE: T.F. Reiss, Merck Research Laboratories, RY 34B-328, Rahway, NJ , 07065–1900, USA. Fax: 1 7325947830. E-mail: theodore_reiss@merck.com

Keywords: asthma, asthma control days, beclomethasone, forced expiratory volume in one second, leukotriene receptor antagonist, montelukast

Received: April 8, 2002
Accepted August 5, 2002

The distribution of responses in study populations provides a novel method of comparing the benefit of two treatments. This 6-week, randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind study compared the effectiveness of oral montelukast with inhaled beclomethasone in chronic asthma by assessing the distribution and overlap of patient responses to therapy, as measured by a clinical outcome (asthma control days).

A total of 730 adult patients with asthma, age 15–65 yrs, with a forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) at baseline of 50–85% of predicted and ≥15% improvement in FEV1 after inhaled ß-agonist were enrolled. After a 2–week placebo run-in period, patients were randomly allocated to receive montelukast (10 mg once daily), inhaled beclomethasone (200 µg twice daily) or placebo. The primary end-point (per cent of asthma control days) was compared between treatments as the overlap in the response distributions.

The overlap of the distribution of responses between the montelukast and beclomethasone groups was 89% for per cent asthma control days and 96% for change from baseline in FEV1. The mean (±sd) per cent asthma control days in the montelukast and beclomethasone groups was significantly higher than that in the placebo group (placebo 40.0±35.8, montelukast 50.7±37.1, beclomethasone 57.9±36.1). The mean differences between montelukast and placebo, beclomethasone and placebo, and montelukast and beclomethasone were significant. The mean per cent change (±sd) from baseline in FEV1 was 12.1±18.7 and 13.9±20.8 in the montelukast and beclomethasone groups, respectively, and significantly greater than that in the placebo group (6.4±20.1); there was no significant difference between the montelukast and beclomethasone groups in mean values or response distribution. There was also no difference among treatment groups in the frequency of adverse experiences.

A comparison of the response distribution is an important approach to comparing therapies; montelukast and beclomethasone provided similar response distributions for the end-point of per cent asthma control days over a 6-week treatment period.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
M. Peters-Golden, A. Swern, S. S. Bird, C. M. Hustad, E. Grant, and J. M. Edelman
Influence of body mass index on the response to asthma controller agents.
Eur. Respir. J., March 1, 2006; 27(3): 495 - 503.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
M. R. Zeidler, E. C. Kleerup, J. G. Goldin, H. J. Kim, D. A. Truong, M. D. Simmons, J. W. Sayre, W. Liu, R. Elashoff, and D. P. Tashkin
Montelukast improves regional air-trapping due to small airways obstruction in asthma
Eur. Respir. J., February 1, 2006; 27(2): 307 - 315.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
M. L. Garcia Garcia, U. Wahn, L. Gilles, A. Swern, C. A. Tozzi, and P. Polos
Montelukast, Compared With Fluticasone, for Control of Asthma Among 6- to 14-Year-Old Patients With Mild Asthma: The MOSAIC Study
Pediatrics, August 1, 2005; 116(2): 360 - 369.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chronic Respiratory DiseaseHome page
P Enright
Spirometry should be measured in the offices of general practitioners
Chronic Respiratory Disease, April 1, 2005; 2(2): 109 - 111.
[PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
W. Busse and M. Kraft
Cysteinyl Leukotrienes in Allergic Inflammation: Strategic Target for Therapy
Chest, April 1, 2005; 127(4): 1312 - 1326.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
G.L. Braunstein
Distribution of therapeutic response in asthma control
Eur. Respir. J., September 1, 2003; 22(3): 568 - 568.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the European Respiratory Society.