ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Leger, P.
Right arrow Articles by Laier-Groeneveld, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Leger, P.
Right arrow Articles by Laier-Groeneveld, G.
Eur Respir J 2002; 20:1573-1578
Copyright ©ERS Journals Ltd 2002


Infrastructure, funding and follow-up in a programme of noninvasive ventilation

P. Leger1 and G. Laier-Groeneveld2

1 Actions Médicales, Association Française Contre les Myopathies, Cedex, France. 2 Klinikum Erfurt 1. Medizinische Klinik, Zentrum für Pneumologie, Erfurt, Germany

CORRESPONDENCE: P. Leger, Actions Médicales, Association Française Contre les Myopathies, 1 Rue de l'Internaale, BP 59 91002, EVRY Cedex, France. Fax: 33 169472552. E-mail: pleger@afm.genethon.fr

Keywords: acute respiratory failure, chronic respiratory failure, follow-up, noninvasive ventilation, organisation

Received: September 6, 2002
Accepted September 9, 2002

Abstract

Originating from centres charged with the care of patients with chronic respiratory insufficiency, noninvasive ventilation (NIV) has been used increasingly in chronic and acute respiratory failure during the last decade. Despite a considerable number of series and randomised studies advocating access to NIV for units that treat acute or chronic ventilatory failure, the number of units and the proportion of total ventilatory support remains poor. This is due to lack of education, as many units treat only a few patients per year. Indication, technique, education, monitoring and home care require special experience and a special environment and there is a wide range throughout Europe. With respect to home care in particular, there are many organisations, which range from totally private to hospital based or run for profit. A concerted action, funded by the European Union, will soon provide valuable information about the practice of home ventilation in Europe based on a European survey.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the European Respiratory Society.