Copyright ©ERS Journals Ltd 2002 Assessment and evaluation of symptomatic steroid-naive asthmatics without sputum eosinophilia and their response to inhaled corticosteroids1 Dept of Chest Medicine, Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur, Montreal and 2 Heart and Chest Institute, Hôpital Laval, Sainte Foy, Quebec, Canada CORRESPONDENCE: C. Lemière, Dept of Chest Medicine, Sacré-Coeur Hospital, 5400 West Gouin, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H4J 1C5. Fax: 1 5143383123. E-mail: lemierec@crhsc.umontreal.ca Keywords: asthma, eosinophils, induced sputum, inhaled corticosteroids
Received: March 1, 2002
This study was funded by Réseau en santé respiratoire du FRSQ and GlaxoSmithKline Canada. C. Lemière and J-L. Malo are scholars of the Fonds de la recherche en santé du Québec.
Eosinophilic airway inflammation is one of the hallmarks of asthma. Sputum eosinophilia has been suggested as a predictor of the response to inhaled corticosteroids in asthma. This study sought to investigate the proportion of steroid-naive uncontrolled asthmatics without significant sputum eosinophilia (
A total of 51 mild uncontrolled steroid-naive asthmatics who had not been treated with oral or inhaled corticosteroids for at least 3 months were investigated. The evaluation included a spirometry, methacholine inhalation challenge and sputum induction on two occasions, one at baseline and the other after 1 month of treatment with 250 µg twice-daily fluticasone propionate.
Of the 51 subjects, 15 had an eosinophil count
The absence of sputum eosinophilia does not seem to be an indicator of poor response to inhaled corticosteroid treatment in steroid-naive asthmatics. However, this finding needs to be investigated further in a double-blind, placebo-controlled study, entirely designed to answer this question.
This article has been cited by other articles:
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||