HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (5) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Highcock, M.P. Articles by Smith, I.E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Highcock, M.P. Articles by Smith, I.E.

An overnight comparison of two ventilators used in the treatment of chronic respiratory failure

The Respiratory Support and Sleep Centre, Papworth Hospital, Papworth Everard, Cambridge, UK

CORRESPONDENCE: M.P. Highcock, The Respiratory Support and Sleep Centre, Papworth Hospital, Papworth Everard, Cambridge, CB3 8RE, UK. Fax: 44 1480830620. E-mail: martin.highcock@dbh.nhs.uk

Keywords: bilevel pressure ventilators, chronic respiratory failure, nocturnal ventilation, sleep quality, thoracic scoliosis

Received: November 29, 2001
Accepted May 22, 2002

Differences between bilevel ventilators used for noninvasive intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) have been demonstrated during bench testing. However, there are no clinical studies comparing these machines. The authors have previously shown that the Quantum pressure support ventilator and Sullivan variable positive airway pressure II ST differ in performance during bench testing. To examine the clinical significance of this, these two machines were compared in the overnight treatment of subjects with chronic respiratory failure.

Ten clinically-stable subjects with thoracic scoliosis were recruited. The subjects were already established on NIPPV, but none were using either of the ventilators to be tested. After familiarisation, the patients used the two ventilators in random order on consecutive nights. Peripheral oxygen saturation and transcutaneous carbon dioxide tension (P_t,CO2) were measured continuously, and sleep was recorded using polysomnography.

There were no significant differences in arterial oxygen saturation, P_t,CO2 or sleep duration and quality between the two nights.

Despite previously illustrated variation in laboratory performance, no differences were seen between the two ventilators when comparing overnight gas exchange and sleep in vivo. Further study is required to evaluate the significance of the differences found during bench testing in the clinical setting.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. Farre, S. J. Lloyd-Owen, N. Ambrosino, G. Donaldson, J. Escarrabill, B. Fauroux, D. Robert, B. Schoenhofer, A. Simonds, and J. A. Wedzicha Quality control of equipment in home mechanical ventilation: a European survey Eur. Respir. J., July 1, 2005; 26(1): 86 - 94. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]