ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (45)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bateman, E.D.
Right arrow Articles by Braunstein, G.L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bateman, E.D.
Right arrow Articles by Braunstein, G.L.
Eur Respir J 2002; 20:588-596
Copyright ©ERS Journals Ltd 2002


Achieving guideline-based asthma control: does the patient benefit?

E.D. Bateman1, L.F. Frith2 and G.L. Braunstein2

1 UCT Lung Institute, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa, 2 GlaxoSmithKline Research and Development, Stockley Park, Uxbridge, UK

CORRESPONDENCE: E.D. Bateman, UCT Lung Institute, PO Box 34560, Groote Schuur 7937, Cape Town, South Africa. Fax: 27 214066902. E-mail: ebateman@uctgsh1.uct.ac.za

Keywords: asthma control, budesonide, fluticasone propionate, practice guidelines, quality of life, salmeterol

Received: November 13, 2001
Accepted March 4, 2002

Asthma management guidelines define asthma control, but the outcome criteria used do not include the patient's own assessment of their health. The objective of the present study was to determine the association between the achievement of asthma control, as defined by the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guidelines, and patient-assessed asthma-related quality of life (QOL), particularly whether maximal or near-maximal QOL scores were attainable.

Clinical data from three studies that compared salmeterol/fluticasone propionate combination therapy (SFC) with other treatments in patients with persistent asthma were retrospectively analysed. Achievement of asthma control was determined over an 8-week period in each study according to six parameters derived from the GINA guideline treatment goals. Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) scores (a 7-point scale, where 1=severe impairment and 7=no impairment) were analysed by treatment group for well-controlled and not well-controlled patients.

The analysis showed that, across a range of severities, well-controlled asthma patients had consistently higher AQLQ scores at endpoint and larger AQLQ improvements from baseline, than patients who were not well controlled. For many well-controlled patients, endpoint scores approached 7, indicating little or no impact of asthma on their QOL. However, AQLQ scores of not well-controlled patients also improved substantially in some treatment groups, particularly the SFC group.

These results suggest a relationship between the achievement of guideline-based asthma control and improvements in quality of life to levels where there is little or no impact of asthma on quality of life. Guideline-based asthma control is therefore beneficial to the patient and should be tested in prospective studies.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
E. D. Bateman, J. Bousquet, M. L. Keech, W. W. Busse, T. J. H. Clark, S. E. Pedersen, and on behalf of the GOAL Investigators Group
The correlation between asthma control and health status: the GOAL study
Eur. Respir. J., January 1, 2007; 29(1): 56 - 62.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
S. Ragab, G. K. Scadding, V. J. Lund, and H. Saleh
Treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis and its effects on asthma
Eur. Respir. J., July 1, 2006; 28(1): 68 - 74.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ERRHome page
A. E. Williams, A. C. Lloyd, L. Watson, and K. F. Rabe
Cost of scheduled and unscheduled asthma management in seven European Union countries
Eur. Respir. Rev., June 1, 2006; 15(98): 4 - 9.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
I. Berti, G. Longo, S. Visintin, B. A. Chowdhury, C. R. Jenkins, G. B. Marks, H. K. Reddel, D. K.C. Lee, A. Raghupathy, B. Brashier, et al.
Treatment of Mild Asthma
N. Engl. J. Med., July 28, 2005; 353(4): 424 - 427.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
C. R. Jenkins, F. C. K. Thien, J. R. Wheatley, and H. K. Reddel
Traditional and patient-centred outcomes with three classes of asthma medication
Eur. Respir. J., July 1, 2005; 26(1): 36 - 44.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
E. D. Bateman, H. A. Boushey, J. Bousquet, W. W. Busse, T. J. H. Clark, R. A. Pauwels, S. E. Pedersen, and for the GOAL Investigators Group
Can Guideline-defined Asthma Control Be Achieved?: The Gaining Optimal Asthma ControL Study
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., October 15, 2004; 170(8): 836 - 844.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin Med ResHome page
G. L. Colice
Categorizing Asthma Severity: An Overview of National Guidelines
Clin. Med. Res., August 1, 2004; 2(3): 155 - 163.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
G.L. Braunstein
Distribution of therapeutic response in asthma control
Eur. Respir. J., September 1, 2003; 22(3): 568 - 568.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the European Respiratory Society.