Eur Respir J 2002; 20:339-343
Copyright ©ERS Journals Ltd 2002
Intravenous iloprost for treatment failure of aerosolised iloprost in pulmonary arterial hypertension
M.M. Hoeper,
E. Spiekerkoetter,
V. Westerkamp,
R. Gatzke and
H. Fabel
Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
CORRESPONDENCE: M.M. Hoeper, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany. Fax: 49 5115328536. E-mail: hoeper.marius@mh-hannover.de
Keywords: hypertension, pulmonary, iloprost, prostacyclin
Received: December 5, 2001
Accepted March 4, 2002
Treatment with aerosolised iloprost, a prostacyclin analogue, has beneficial effects in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). It is unclear if patients, whose clinical condition deteriorates under treatment with aerosolised iloprost, benefit from switching to continuous intravenous iloprost.
The current authors report on 16 patients with severe PAH who received continuous intravenous iloprost after primary or secondary failure of treatment with aerosolised iloprost. Determinants of efficacy were survival, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class, and walking distance in the 6-min walk test.
Of 93 patients with PAH treated with aerosolised iloprost, 16 required switching to intravenous iloprost for clinical deterioration. These patients had severe right heart failure with a cardiac index of 1.6±0.2 L·min1·m2 and a mixed-venous oxygen saturation of 52±6%. Five of these patients showed no improvement and eventually died. Three patients had further deterioration in NYHA class and exercise capacity; two of them underwent lung transplantation; the third patient is still alive. Eight patients showed marked clinical improvement; one underwent lung transplantation and the others are currently alive and stable. In the latter group of patients, the walking distance in the 6-min walk test increased from 205±94 to 329±59 m. It was not possible to identify clinical or haemodynamic factors that would predict whether switching from inhaled to intravenous iloprost would have a beneficial effect.
In patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension who deteriorated while being treated with aerosolised iloprost, switching to continuous intravenous iloprost caused substantial improvement in exercise capacity in eight of 16 patients but could not prevent progression of pulmonary hypertension in the remaining eight patients. Since it was impossible to predict the individual effects of this approach, intravenous prostaglandin treatment should be considered in pulmonary arterial hypertension patients who deteriorate while receiving iloprost aerosol.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. M. Hoeper, H. Gall, H. J. Seyfarth, M. Halank, H. A. Ghofrani, J. Winkler, H. Golpon, K. M. Olsson, N. Nickel, C. Opitz, et al.
Long-term outcome with intravenous iloprost in pulmonary arterial hypertension
Eur. Respir. J.,
July 1, 2009;
34(1):
132 - 137.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
National Pulmonary Hypertension Centres of the UK
Consensus statement on the management of pulmonary hypertension in clinical practice in the UK and Ireland
Heart,
March 1, 2008;
94(Suppl_1):
i1 - i41.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
National Pulmonary Hypertension Centres of the UK
Consensus statement on the management of pulmonary hypertension in clinical practice in the UK and Ireland
Thorax,
March 1, 2008;
63(Suppl_2):
ii1 - ii41.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Pizanis, V. Milekhin, K. Tsagakis, I. Aleksic, M. Kamler, and H. Jakob
PDE-5 inhibitor donor intravenous preconditioning is superior to supplementation in standard preservation solution in experimental lung transplantation
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.,
July 1, 2007;
32(1):
42 - 47.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. F. Opitz, R. Wensel, J. Winkler, M. Halank, L. Bruch, F.-X. Kleber, G. Hoffken, S. D. Anker, A. Negassa, S. B. Felix, et al.
Clinical efficacy and survival with first-line inhaled iloprost therapy in patients with idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension
Eur. Heart J.,
September 2, 2005;
26(18):
1895 - 1902.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H.-J. Seyfarth, H. Pankau, S. Hammerschmidt, J. Schauer, H. Wirtz, and J. Winkler
Bosentan Improves Exercise Tolerance and Tei Index in Patients With Pulmonary Hypertension and Prostanoid Therapy
Chest,
August 1, 2005;
128(2):
709 - 713.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M Halank, C Marx, and G Hoeffken
Long term survival in primary pulmonary hypertension
Heart,
July 1, 2004;
90(7):
e40 - e40.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Rabinovitch
The Mouse Through the Looking Glass: A New Door Into the Pathophysiology of Pulmonary Hypertension
Circ. Res.,
April 30, 2004;
94(8):
1001 - 1004.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M.M. Hoeper, N. Taha, A. Bekjarova, R. Gatzke, and E. Spiekerkoetter
Bosentan treatment in patients with primary pulmonary hypertension receiving nonparenteral prostanoids
Eur. Respir. J.,
August 1, 2003;
22(2):
330 - 334.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2002 by the European Respiratory Society.
|