ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Permissions
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (14)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Künzli, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Künzli, N.
Eur Respir J 2002; 20:198-209
Copyright ©ERS Journals Ltd 2002


The public health relevance of air pollution abatement

N. Künzli

N. Künzli, Institute for Social and Preventive Medicine, Basel University, Switzerland

CORRESPONDENCE: Nino Künzli, Steinengraben 49, 4051, Basel, Switzerland. Fax: 41 612676190. E-mail: Nino.Kuenzli@unibas.ch

Keywords: air pollution, clean air regulation, health-impact assessment, PM10, population attributable risk

Received: March 18, 2002
Accepted March 18, 2002

The author is a recipient of a National Science Foundation Advanced Scientist Fellowship (#3233-048922.96/1).

Abstract

Assuming a causal relationship between current levels of air pollution and morbidity/mortality, it is crucial to estimate the public health relevance of the problem. The derivation of air pollution attributable cases faces inherent uncertainties and requires influential assumptions. Based on the results of the trinational impact assessment study of Austria, France, and Switzerland, where prudent estimates of the air pollution attributable cases (mortality, chronic bronchitis incidence, hospital admissions, acute bronchitis among children, restricted activity days, asthma attacks) have been made, influential uncertainties are quantified in this review.

The public health impact of smoking, environmental tobacco smoke, and air pollution on the prevalence of chronic cough/phlegm are outlined. Despite all methodological caveats, impact assessment studies clearly suggest that public health largely benefits from better air quality. The studies are selective underestimates as they are strongly driven by mortality, but do not include full quantification of the impact on morbidity and their consequences on quality of life among the diseased and the caregivers.

Air pollution abatement strategies are usually political in nature, targeting at policies, regulation and technology in mobile or stationary sources rather than at individuals. It is of note that key clean air strategies converge into abatement of climate change. In general, energy consumption is very closely related to both air pollution and greenhouse gases. The dominant causes of both problems are the excessive and inefficient combustion of fossil fuel. Thus, for many policy options, the benefit of air pollution abatement will go far beyond what prudent health-impact assessments may derive. From a climate change and air pollution perspective, improved energy efficiency and a strong and decisive departure from the "fossil fuel" combustion society is a science-based must. Health professionals must raise their voices in the political decision process to give strong support for clean air policies, both on a national and international level.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
B G Armstrong and A Darnton
Estimating reduction in occupational disease burden following reduction in exposure
Occup. Environ. Med., September 1, 2008; 65(9): 592 - 596.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
G. Invernizzi, A. Ruprecht, C. De Marco, P. Paredi, and R. Boffi
Residual tobacco smoke: measurement of its washout time in the lung and of its contribution to environmental tobacco smoke
Tob. Control, February 1, 2007; 16(1): 29 - 33.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
R. Boffi, A. Ruprecht, R. Mazza, M. Ketzel, and G. Invernizzi
A day at the European Respiratory Society Congress: passive smoking influences both outdoor and indoor air quality.
Eur. Respir. J., April 1, 2006; 27(4): 862 - 863.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
G Invernizzi, A Ruprecht, R Mazza, E Rossetti, A Sasco, S Nardini, and R Boffi
Particulate matter from tobacco versus diesel car exhaust: an educational perspective
Tob. Control, September 1, 2004; 13(3): 219 - 221.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Aff (Millwood)Home page
L. O. Gostin, J. I. Boufford, and R. M. Martinez
The Future Of The Public's Health: Vision, Values, And Strategies
Health Aff., July 1, 2004; 23(4): 96 - 107.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
M. Decramer, R. Loddenkemper, J. Boe, J. Roca, and M. Zelter
Air pollution effects in the elderly: introduction
Eur. Respir. J., May 1, 2003; 21(40_suppl): 1S - 2s.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the European Respiratory Society.