ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Permissions
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Guilleminault, C
Right arrow Articles by Riley, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Guilleminault, C
Right arrow Articles by Riley, R.
Eur Respir J 1989; 2: 604-612
Copyright © ERS Journals Ltd 1989


Original Articles

Maxillo-mandibular surgery for obstructive sleep apnoea

C Guilleminault, MA Quera-Salva, NB Powell, and RW Riley

Many therapeutic approaches, including mandibular surgery, have been proposed for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome. In the largest study of its type yet reported, 54 patients (population A) underwent mandibular surgery: 36 had palato-pharyngoplasty and inferior sagittal osteotomy of the mandible with hyoid myotomy and resuspension, and 18 (population B) had maxillo-mandibular hyoid advancement, a procedure consisting of palato-pharyngoplasty, inferior sagittal osteotomy of the mandible with hyoid myotomy and, several months later, a maxillo-mandibular osteotomy. Criteria for procedure selection and for evaluation of results were pre-set, and clinical and polygraphic follow-up occurred 6-8 months after final surgery. In population A, 32 of the 36 patients had improved; but only 20 were evaluated as "satisfactory". In contrast, all of the population B patients were judged satisfactory. Four of the population B patients received nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) before any surgery, and both approaches gave similar good polygraphic results. The degree of skeletal cranio-facial deficiencies, particularly retrognathia, is crucial for procedure selection. We describe potential procedural risks and problems.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 by the European Respiratory Society.