ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Egermann, U.
Right arrow Articles by Solèr, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Egermann, U.
Right arrow Articles by Solèr, M.
Eur Respir J 2002; 19:464-468
Copyright ©ERS Journals Ltd 2002


Regular follow-up after curative resection of nonsmall cell lung cancer: a real benefit for patients?

U. Egermann1, K. Jaeggi2, J.M. Habicht3, A.P. Perruchoud1, P. Dalquen2 and M. Solèr1

1 Pulmonary Division, Dept of Internal Medicine, 2 Institute of Pathology and 3 Dept of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland

CORRESPONDENCE: M. Solèr, St Claraspital, CH-4016, Basel, Switzerland. Fax: 41 616858469. E-mail: markus.soler@araspital.ch

Keywords: cost effectiveness, lung cancer, post-operative follow-up

Received: April 27, 2001
Accepted October 9, 2001

Even though complete resection is regarded as the only curative treatment for nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC), >50% of resected patients die from a recurrence or a second primary tumour of the lung within 5 yrs. It remains unclear, whether follow-up in these patients is cost-effective and whether it can improve the outcome due to early detection of recurrent tumour.

The benefit of regular follow-up in a consecutive series of 563 patients, who had undergone potentially curative resection for NSCLC at the University Hospital, was analysed. The follow-up consisted of clinical visits and chest radiography according to a standard protocol for up to 10 yrs. Survival rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier analysis method and the cost-effectiveness of the follow-up programme was assessed.

A total of 23 patients (6.4% of the group with lobectomy) underwent further operation with curative intent for a second pulmonary malignancy. The regular follow-up over a 10-yr period provided the chance for a second curative treatment to 3.8% of all patients.

The calculated costs per life-yr gained were 90,000 Swiss Francs. The cost-effectiveness of the follow-up protocol was far above those of comparable large-scale surveillance programmes. Based on these data, the intensity and duration of the follow-up was reduced.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ChestHome page
J. Rubins, M. Unger, and G. L. Colice
Follow-up and Surveillance of the Lung Cancer Patient Following Curative Intent Therapy: ACCP Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guideline (2nd Edition)
Chest, September 1, 2007; 132(3_suppl): 355S - 367S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
B. Jeremic, J. Classen, and M. Bamberg
Regular follow{-}up for patients irradiated for early stage nonsmall{-}cell lung cancer too!
Eur. Respir. J., January 1, 2002; 20(4): 1065 - 1066.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the European Respiratory Society.