HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (4) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Marchand, E. Articles by Decramer, M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Marchand, E. Articles by Decramer, M.

Effects of lung volume reduction surgery in hamsters with elastase-induced emphysema

¹ Respiratory Muscle Research Unit, Laboratory of Pneumology, ² Dept of Thoracic Surgery, ³ Dept of Histopathology, University Hospitals, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven and ⁴ Dept of Pneumology, Mont-Godinne Université Catholique de Louvain University Hospital, Yvoir, Belgium

CORRESPONDENCE: M. Decramer, Respiratory Muscle Research Unit, Laboratory of Pneumology, University Hospitals, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, B-3000, Leuven, Belgium. Fax: 32 16347126. E-mail: marc.decramer@uz.kuleuven.ac.be

Keywords: airway obstruction, emphysema, maximal expiratory flow rate, pneumonectomy, respiratory mechanics

Received: September 6, 2001
Accepted November 22, 2001

This study was supported by FWO-Vlaanderen grant G.0175.99 and KULeuven Research Foundation grant OT98/27. G. Gayan-Ramirez is postdoctoral fellow of the FWO-Vlaanderen.

Lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) has been shown to improve respiratory mechanics in selected patients with severe emphysema. This is thought to be due to an improvement in lung elastic recoil. This study was aimed at gaining further understanding about the effects of LVRS on respiratory mechanics and airway function.

Control hamsters instilled with saline (Ctrl; n=8) were compared with emphysematous animals that underwent either a sham operation (Sham; n=7) or an LVRS (LVRS; n=7).

As expected, there was a significant increase in the static lung volumes in the Sham as compared to the Ctrl group and a significant decrease of these volumes in LVRS as compared to the Sham group. Surprisingly, emphysema was associated with a significant increase and LVRS with a significant decrease in vital capacity. Despite a tendency toward an increase in lung compliance as compared to Sham, indices of maximal expiratory flows tended to decrease with LVRS. As opposed to humans, there was no change in the distribution of airway diameters in Sham compared to Ctrl.

These findings appear to be largely explained by the high compliance of the hamster chest wall. This allows for better matching between the emphysematous lung and the chest-wall sizes than in humans.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G. Borzone, L. Liberona, P. Olmos, C. Saez, M. Meneses, T. Reyes, R. Moreno, and C. Lisboa Rat and hamster species differences in susceptibility to elastase-induced pulmonary emphysema relate to differences in elastase inhibitory capacity Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, September 1, 2007; 293(3): R1342 - R1349. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Decramer Treatment of chronic respiratory failure: lung volume reduction surgery versus rehabilitation Eur. Respir. J., November 16, 2003; 22(47_suppl): 47s - 56s. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]