ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hall, G.L.
Right arrow Articles by Frey, U.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hall, G.L.
Right arrow Articles by Frey, U.
Eur Respir J 2001; 18:982-988
Copyright ©ERS Journals Ltd 2001


Evaluation of the interrupter technique in healthy, unsedated infants

G.L. Hall, J.H. Wildhaber, M. Cernelc and U. Frey

Swiss Paediatric Respiratory Physiology Research Group, University Children's Hospital, Berne & Zürich, Switzerland

CORRESPONDENCE: U. Frey, Paediatric Respiratory Medicine, Dept of Paediatrics, University Hospital, Inselspital, Berne, CH-3010, Switzerland. Fax: 41 316329484

Keywords: airway resistance, interrupter technique, respiratory resistance, unsedated infants

Received: March 6, 2001
Accepted August 10, 2001

This work was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (Score grant: 3200-052197.97/1), the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia, the Swiss Cystic Fibrosis Society and AstraZeneca (Switzerland).

The interrupter technique may be used to monitor respiratory resistance and does not require active patient cooperation, but has yet to be applied in unsedated, spontaneously breathing infants. The aim of this study was to determine if the interrupter technique is feasible in spontaneously breathing infants and to investigate the influence of facemask types and analysis techniques on the interrupter resistance (Rint).

Rint was measured in 14 healthy, unsedated, sleeping infants (aged 38.4 (31–56) days (mean (range)). Paired measurements were made using large volume, compliant (Mcomp) and small volume, rigid (Mrigid) facemasks. Flow and pressure were measured at the airway opening prior to- and following a brief airway occlusion (500 ms). Rint was calculated using four previously reported analysis techniques.

Rint could be measured in all infants. Mcomp, independent of the analysis method significantly underestimated Rint (p<0.001). The variability and magnitude of Rint were significantly influenced by the choice of analysis method.

The conclusion is that the interrupter technique is feasible in spontaneously breathing, unsedated infants. Equipment design and analysis method significantly influences interrupter resistance. Studies standardizing equipment and identifying the most appropriate analysis technique in this age group are needed.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
N. Beydon, S. D. Davis, E. Lombardi, J. L. Allen, H. G. M. Arets, P. Aurora, H. Bisgaard, G. M. Davis, F. M. Ducharme, H. Eigen, et al.
An Official American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society Statement: Pulmonary Function Testing in Preschool Children
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., June 15, 2007; 175(12): 1304 - 1345.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.Home page
M R Thomas, G F Rafferty, R Blowes, J L Peacock, N Marlow, S Calvert, A Milner, and A Greenough
Plethysmograph and interrupter resistance measurements in prematurely born young children
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., May 1, 2006; 91(3): F193 - F196.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child.Home page
Respiratory
Arch. Dis. Child., April 1, 2005; 90(suppl_2): A59 - A63.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the European Respiratory Society.