|
|
||||||||
1 Medical Intensive Care Unit, Lyon Sud Hospital and Claude Bernard Lyon I University, Lyon, France, and 2 Meakins-Christie Laboratories, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
CORRESPONDENCE: C. Guérin, Service de Reanimation Medicale et d'Assistance Respiratoire, Hopital de la Croix-Rousse, 103 Grande Rue de la Croix-Rousse, 69004, Lyon, France. Fax: 33 472071774
Keywords: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, interrupter technique, positive end-expiratory pressure, pulmonary hyperinflation, tissue resistance, volume dependence of respiratory resistance
Received: August 11, 2000
Accepted May 7, 2001
This work was supported by a grant from the Hospices Civils de Lyon.
This study aimed to investigate the effect of increased lung volume with positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) on respiratory resistance in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
Ten patients with COPD were mechanically ventilated for acute respiratory failure. PEEP was set at 0, 5, 10 and 15 cmH2O. Using the rapid airway occlusion technique, the total inspiratory resistance of the respiratory system was partitioned into interrupter (Rint,rs) and additional effective (
The difference between the EELV and the relaxation volume of the respiratory system (
With increasing lung volume induced by positive end-expiratory pressure, the inspiratory airway resistance decreased, whereas the viscoelastic behaviour of the respiratory system, as reflected by additional effective resistance, did not change.
Rrs) resistances. At each level of PEEP, at constant inflation flow, the inflation volume (
V) was varied from 0.21 L, and, at constant
V, the inflation flow was varied from 0.21.2 L·s1. The changes in end-expiratory lung volume (
EELV) induced by PEEP were also measured.
FRC) increased significantly with PEEP of 10 and 15 cmH2O as compared to a PEEP of 0, the increase being associated with a significant reduction of Rint,rs. By contrast,
Rrs was independent of
FRC. At constant
V, Rint,rs fitted Rohrer's equation (Rint,rs =K1+K2xflow). While K2 significantly declined with
FRC, K1 did not change. At all levels of PEEP,
Rrs was not influenced by
FRC.
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |