ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Permissions
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chavasse, R.J.
Right arrow Articles by Seddon, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chavasse, R.J.
Right arrow Articles by Seddon, P.
Eur Respir J 2001; 18:330-334
Copyright ©ERS Journals Ltd 2001


Comparison of resistance measured by the interrupter technique and by passive mechanics in sedated infants

R.J. Chavasse, Y. Bastian-Lee and P. Seddon

The Royal Alexandra Hospital for Sick Children, Dyke Road, Brighton, UK

CORRESPONDENCE: P. Seddon, The Research Centre, The Royal Alexandra Hospital for Sick Children, Dyke Road, Brighton, BN1 3JN, UK. Fax: 44 1273321441

Keywords: Chest wall mechanics, infant, interrupter technique, interrupter resistance in infants, lung mechanics, passive mechanics

Received: February 28, 2000
Accepted April 25, 2001

Airways resistance measured by the interrupter technique (Rint) requires little patient cooperation and has been successfully used in young children, but little studied in infants. The authors aimed to evaluate the measurement of Rint in infants, using a commercially available device (the MicroRint), by comparing it with an established technique to measure respiratory resistance: the single breath occlusion technique (SBT); and a measure of airflow obstruction during forced expiration.

Infants <18 months old with a history of wheeze, sedated with triclofos for pulmonary function testing, had measurements taken and compared to Rint (using the MicroRint), respiratory system resistance (Rrs) by SBT, and to maximal flow at functional residual capacity (V'maxFRC).

Paired data from 25 of 37 infants studied was obtained. There was a significant difference between Rint (mean 2.94±0.68) and Rrs (4.02±0.87), but the two measures were strongly correlated (r=0.7). Rint was negatively correlated with V'maxFRC (r=–0.63). Smaller infants failed to trigger the MicroRint.

Interrupter resistance values in infants are significantly lower than values of respiratory system resistance obtained by passive mechanics. However, there is a strong correlation between the two measurements, as well as between resistance measured using the interrupter technique and maximal flow at functional residual capacity, which indicates that resistance measured using the interrupter technique may be a useful marker of airway obstruction in infants. There remain a number of theoretical and technical problems which require further exploration.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.Home page
M R Thomas, G F Rafferty, R Blowes, J L Peacock, N Marlow, S Calvert, A Milner, and A Greenough
Plethysmograph and interrupter resistance measurements in prematurely born young children
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., May 1, 2006; 91(3): F193 - F196.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CMAJHome page
Diagnosis of asthma
Can. Med. Assoc. J., September 13, 2005; 173(6_suppl): S15 - S19.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the European Respiratory Society.