|
 |
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
Copyright ©ERS Journals Ltd 2001
Comparison of the standard gamble, rating scale, AQLQ and SF-36 for measuring quality of life in asthma
1 Dept of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University Faculty of Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, 2 GlaxoWellcome Inc., Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA, 3 Dept of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
CORRESPONDENCE: E. Juniper, 20 Marcuse Fields, Bosham, West Sussex, PO18 8NA, UK. Fax: 44 1243573680
Keywords: asthma, measurement, quality of life, questionnaires, utilities
Received: October 9, 2000
Accepted March 9, 2001
This study was supported through a grant from GlaxoWellcome.
With interest in health economics growing, there is a demand for valid methods for measuring health-related quality of life (HRQL) in asthma using utilities. The aims of this study were to develop disease-specific versions of the standard gamble and rating scale, to compare their measurement properties with those of the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) and the Medical Outcomes Survey Short-Form 36 (SF-36), as well as to determine their validity for assessing asthma-specific quality of life.
Forty adults with symptomatic asthma participated in a 9-week observational study. Participants completed the standard gamble, rating scale, AQLQ, SF-36 and other measures of clinical asthma status at baseline and after 1, 5 and 9 weeks.
In patients whose asthma was stable between assessments, reliability was good for the rating scale (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)=0.89) and the AQLQ (ICC=0.95) but more modest for the SF-36 mental score (ICC=0.68), SF-36 physical score (ICC= 0.65) and standard gamble (ICC=0.59). The responsiveness index was highest in the AQLQ (1.35), followed by the rating scale (0.74), the physical score of the SF-36 (0.61) and the standard gamble (0.31). Construct validity (correlation with other indices of health status) was strongest for the AQLQ and the rating scale.
In conclusion, both the disease-specific rating scale and the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire have strong measurement properties for measuring asthma-specific quality of life; the Short-Form 36 health survey physical summary score has more modest properties. Although the disease-specific standard gamble has acceptable discriminative properties, its evaluative properties are too inadequate for it to be used in cost/utility analyses. Poor correlation between the standard gamble and the rating scale indicates that utilities cannot be derived from rating scale data.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  G. H. Guyatt, C. E. Ferrans, M. Y. Halyard, D. A. Revicki, T. L. Symonds, C. G. Varricchio, A. Kotzeva, J. M. Valderas, J. L. Alonso, and Clinical Significance Consensus Meeting Group Exploration of the Value of Health-Related Quality-of-Life Information From Clinical Research and Into Clinical Practice Mayo Clin. Proc., October 1, 2007; 82(10): 1229 - 1239. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. Bumbacea, D. Campbell, L. Nguyen, D. Carr, P.J. Barnes, D. Robinson, and K.F. Chung Parameters associated with persistent airflow obstruction in chronic severe asthma Eur. Respir. J., July 1, 2004; 24(1): 122 - 128. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E.F. Juniper, M.E. Wisniewski, F.M. Cox, A.H. Emmett, K.E. Nielsen, and P.M. O'Byrne Relationship between quality of life and clinical status in asthma: a factor analysis Eur. Respir. J., February 1, 2004; 23(2): 287 - 291. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |