ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Herer, B.
Right arrow Articles by Chouaïd, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Herer, B.
Right arrow Articles by Chouaïd, C.
Eur Respir J 2001; 18:157-163
Copyright ©ERS Journals Ltd 2001


Diagnosis of nosocomial pneumonia in medical ward: repeatability of the protected specimen brush

B. Herer1,2, C. Fuhrman2, D. Demontrond1, Z. Gazevic1, B. Housset2 and C. Chouaïd2

1 Centre Médical de Forcilles, F-77170, Férolles-Attilly, and 2 Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Créteil, F-94000, Créteil, France

CORRESPONDENCE: B. Herer, Centre Médical de Forcilles, F-77170, Férolles-Attilly, France. Fax: 33 164055591

Keywords: bronchoscopy, nosocomial, pneumonia, reproducibility of results

Received: November 22, 1999
Accepted January 10, 2001

Supported in part by a grant from the Association "Compliance".

The aims of this study were to assess the repeatability of two pairs of protected specimen brushes (PSB) done successively in the same lung area and either processed at the bedside or in the laboratory, and to provide a description of the bacteriological findings in 39 cases of suspected nosocomial pneumonia occurring in nonventilated patients.

Four PSB were divided into two pairs. One pair of brushes (Pb) was prepared at bedside and then sent to the laboratory; the other pair (Pl) was immediately sent to the laboratory for complete processing.

According to a 103 colony forming units (cfu)·mL–1 threshold, 49% out of 156 PSB were positive. Using the 103 cfu·mL threshold, the Pl brushes were 89.7% concordant while the Pb brushes were 76.9% concordant. The repeatability as expressed by K-value of the cultures of PSB was higher for Pl brushes than for Pb brushes (K-values of 0.795 and 0.537 respectively, p=0.12). Bacterial species were isolated in 58.3% of 156 PSB (176 isolates). In 14 cases, cultures of PSB disclosed more than one micro-organism in a concentration >103 cfu·mL–1. The most frequently isolated organisms were Pseudomonas spp. (23.9%), Enterobacteriaceae (23.3%), Streptococcus spp. (21.6%) and Staphylococcus spp. (13.1%). Polymicrobial cultures were more frequent if the patient had a tracheostomy (seven out of the nine patients with a tracheostomy versus seven out of the 30 patients without a tracheostomy, p<0.01). Bacteriological discrepancies leading to a potential troublesome choice in antibiotherapy were observed in 31.8% of the patients for Pl brushes and 56.5% of the patients for Pb brushes.

There is a low degree of repeatability of protected specimen brushes outside intensive care units which seem dependent on sampling processing. The distribution of pathogens found in case of suspicion of nosocomial pneumonia in nonventilated patients appears to be similar to that obtained in ventilator-associated pneumonia.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the European Respiratory Society.