HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (6) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Smurra, M.V. Articles by Liistro, G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Smurra, M.V. Articles by Liistro, G.

Sleep fragmentation: comparison of two definitions of short arousals during sleep in OSAS patients

¹ Pneumology and ² EEG Units, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium. ³ Hospital Muniz, Buenos Aires, Argentina

CORRESPONDENCE: D.O. Rodenstein, Pneumology Division, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, 10 av Hippocrate, 1200, Brussels, Belgium. Fax: 32 27643703

Keywords: mvement arousals, polysomnography, sleep apnoea

Received: January 21, 2000
Accepted November 8, 2000

The measurement of arousals during sleep is useful to quantify sleep fragmentation. The criteria for electroencephalography (EEG) arousals defined by the American Sleep Disorders Association (ASDA) have recently been criticized because of lack of interobserver agreement. The authors have adopted a scoring method that associates the increase in chin electromyography (EMG) with the occurrence of an -rhythm in all sleep stages (Université Catholique de Louvain (UCL) definition of arousals). The aim of the present study was to compare the two scoring definitions in terms of agreement and repeatability and the time taken for scoring in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome (OSAS) of varying severity.

Two readers using both ASDA and UCL definitions scored twenty polysomnographies (PSGs) each on two occasions. The PSGs were chosen retrospectively to represent a wide range of arousal index (from 6–82) in OSAS patients.

There was no difference in the arousal indices between readers and between scoring methods. The mean±sd difference between the two definitions (the bias) was 1.1±3.76 (95% confidence interval: –0.66–2.86). There was a strong linear relationship between the arousal index scored with the two definitions (r=0.981, p<0.001). Mean±sd scoring duration was significantly shorter for UCL than for ASDA definitions (18.5±5.4 versus 25.3±6.6 min, p<0.001).

In conclusion, it has been found that in obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome patients, the American Sleep Disorders Association and Université Catholique de Louvain definitions were comparable in terms of agreement and repeatability.