ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Permissions
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (13)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dahlén, B.
Right arrow Articles by Inman, M.D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dahlén, B.
Right arrow Articles by Inman, M.D.
Eur Respir J 2001; 17:581-588
Copyright ©ERS Journals Ltd 2001


The reproducibility and sample size requirements of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction measurements

B. Dahlén1, P.M. O'Byrne2, R.M. Watson2, A. Roquet1, F. Larsen1 and M.D. Inman2

1 Division of Respiratory Medicine, Dept of Medicine at Karolinska Hospital, Karolinska Institute, Stokholm, Sweden. 2 Asthma Research Group, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

CORRESPONDENCE: M.D. Inman, Dept of Medicine, McMaster University, St Joseph's Hospital, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. Fax: 19055406510

Keywords: asthma, exercise-induced bronchoconstriction, intraclass correlation coefficient, power, study design

Received: December 31, 1999
Accepted October 9, 2000

Dry air exercise challenges are frequently used to screen medications that have potential utility in the management of exercise–induced bronchoconstriction (EIB). The purpose of this study was to determine the reproducibility of three outcome measurements made using such challenges, and sample size requirements for drug evaluation studies based on these outcomes.

Forty adult subjects with asthma, who tested positively on a screening exercise challenge, were subjected to two further identical challenges, separated by 1 to >35 days. Outcome measurements included the maximum per cent fall in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), after exercise (% fallmax), and the area under the per cent fall in FEV1/time curve for 30 min (AUC30) and 60 min (AUC60) after exercise.

The reproducibility of these outcomes, as assessed by intraclass correlation coefficients was 0.72, 0.53 and 0.35 for % fallmax, AUC30 and AUC60 measurements, respectively. The sample size requirements to demonstrate an attenuation of EIB equivalent to a 50% reduction in % fallmax was 9, 14 and 19 subjects for the % fallmax, AUC30 and AUC60 responses, respectively (90% power).

It is concluded that the maximum percentage fall in forced expiratory volume in one second has greater reproducibility and results in greater power in clinical trials than area under the curve measurements. Sample size calculation curves are provided which may be used in study design and interpretation of published studies.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
G. Tancredi, S. Quattrucci, F. Scalercio, G. De Castro, A.M. Zicari, E. Bonci, S. Cingolani, L. Indinnimeo, and F. Midulla
3-Min step test and treadmill exercise for evaluating exercise-induced asthma
Eur. Respir. J., April 1, 2004; 23(4): 569 - 574.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the European Respiratory Society.