|
 |
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
Copyright ©ERS Journals Ltd 2001
Airway resistance measured by the interrupter technique: expiration or inspiration, mean or median?
Queen Elizabeth Children's Service, Royal London Hospital, Whitechapel, London
CORRESPONDENCE: S. McKenzie, Queen Elizabeth Children's Service, Royal London Hospital, Whitechapel, London, E1 1BB. Fax: 44 1713777325
Keywords: airway resistance, interrupter resistance
Received: December 12, 1999
Accepted December 14, 2000
This work was supported by GlaxoWellcome and Queen Elizabeth Hospital for Children Trustees.
Abstract
The measurement of airway resistance by the interrupter technique (Rint) needs standardization. Should measurements be made be during the expiratory or inspiratory phase of tidal breathing? In reported studies, the measurement of Rint has been calculated as the median or mean of a small number of values, is there an important difference?
Subjects were 2.5–5.0 yrs (median 4.0 yrs) who had previous respiratory symptoms. The Rint in expiration (RintE) and inspiration (RintI) pre and postsalbutamol, the coefficient of variation (CV) of values contributing to measurements, and bronchodilator responsiveness (BDR) in both phases were compared. Measurements using median and mean were compared.
RintE was higher than RintI by 4% (p<0.01). The CV of values making up RintE and RintI, and BDR measured in expiration and inspiration were similar. The median difference between means and medians of values making up measurements was 0.6% (range –6–11%).
RintE has been shown to be consistently greater then RintI but the difference in this study is small. It is suggested that one or the other is chosen as the standard. In the present data the mean of a set of values contributing to a measurement was not significantly different from the median. However, the use of the median has been recommended since it is less affected by possible outlying values such as might be included by fully automated equipment.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  A. M. Li, H. S. Lam, H. K. So, M. Leung, T. Tsen, C. T. Au, and A. B. Chang Interrupter Respiratory Resistance in Healthy Chinese Preschool Children Chest, August 1, 2009; 136(2): 554 - 560. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 N. Beydon, S. D. Davis, E. Lombardi, J. L. Allen, H. G. M. Arets, P. Aurora, H. Bisgaard, G. M. Davis, F. M. Ducharme, H. Eigen, et al. An Official American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society Statement: Pulmonary Function Testing in Preschool Children Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., June 15, 2007; 175(12): 1304 - 1345. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P D Sly and E Lombardi Measurement of lung function in preschool children using the interrupter technique Thorax, September 1, 2003; 58(9): 742 - 744. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. D. Bridge, S. A. McKenzie, N. Beydon, C. Alberti, and C. Gaultier Time for standardization Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., February 15, 2003; 167(4): 666 - 666. [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G. A. Fontana, T. Pantaleo, F. Lavorini, F. Bongianni, M. Mannelli, P. D. Bridge, and M. Pistolesi Handgrip-induced airway dilation in asthmatic patients with bronchoconstriction induced by MCh inhalation J Appl Physiol, November 1, 2002; 93(5): 1723 - 1730. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S A McKenzie, E Chan, I Dundas, P D Bridge, C S Pao, M Mylonopoulou, and M J R Healy Airway resistance measured by the interrupter technique: normative data for 2-10 year olds of three ethnicities Arch. Dis. Child., September 1, 2002; 87(3): 248 - 251. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |