HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Permissions Request Permissions Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (10) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Takahashi, H. Articles by Abe, S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Takahashi, H. Articles by Abe, S.

Diagnostic significance of surfactant proteins A and D in sera from patients with radiation pneumonitis

¹ Third Dept of Internal Medicine and ² Dept of Biochemistry, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine

CORRESPONDENCE: H. Takahashi, Third Dept of Internal Medicine, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, South-1 West-16, Chuo-ku, Sapporo, 060-8543, Japan. Fax: 011 81116131543

Keywords: radiation pneumonitis, serum marker, surfactant proteins

Received: April 10, 2000
Accepted September 11, 2000

This study was supported by a Grant-In-Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Japan.

Radiation pneumonitis (RP) is the most common complication of radiotherapy for thoracic tumours. The aim of this study was to evaluate the significance of pulmonary surfactant proteins (SP)-A and SP-D as new serum markers for RP.

Twenty-five patients with lung tumour, who had received radiotherapy, were studied. At the completion of radiotherapy, the presence of RP was judged by chest plain radiography and chest high resolution computed tomography (HRCT).

RP findings detected on chest plain radiography were seen in only three of 12 patients in whom RP was detected by HRCT. Nevertheless, both SP-A and SP-D concentrations in sera from the patients with RP were significantly higher than those from the 13 patients without RP (p=0.0065, p=0.0011, respectively). As with SP-A, ratios of SP-D at the completion, compared to at the initiation (1 week post/pre ratio), were also significantly higher in patients with RP than in patients without RP. When a post/pre ratio>1.6 was considered positive, the SP-A and SP-D assays showed an 83% and 85% specificity, respectively.

In conclusion, serum assays of surfactant proteins A and D may be of diagnostic value for detection of radiation pneumonitis, even when the radiographic change is faint.