|
|
||||||||
1 Klinik für Schlafstörungen, Bayerisch Gmain, Germany. 2 Zentrum für Innere Medizin, Philipps-Universität, Schlafmedizinisches Labor, Marburg, Germany
CORRESPONDENCE: J. Juhász, Klinik für Schlafstörungen, Reichenhaller Str. 20, 83457, Bayerisch Gmain, Germany. Fax: 49 8651770105
Keywords: continuous positive airway pressure, proportional positive airway pressure, sleep apnoea, sleep stages
Received: October 14, 1999
Accepted September 15, 2000
This
study was supported by a research grant from Respironics Inc., Murrysville,
USA.
Proportional positive airway pressure (PPAP) was designed to
optimize airway pressure for the therapy of obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA).
In a randomized crossover prospective study, the clinical feasibility of PPAP
and its immediate effects on the breathing disorder and sleep in comparison
with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) was evaluated. Twelve
patients requiring CPAP therapy underwent CPAP and PPAP titration in a random
order.
Obstructive and mixed respiratory events could be completely abolished
with both forms of treatment. This efficacy could be achieved at a significantly
lower mean mask pressure during PPAP titration (8.45±2.42 cmH2O) compared to CPAP (9.96±2.7 cmH2O) (p=0.002).
The mean minimal arterial oxygen saturation (Sa,O2) (82.8±6.5%) on the diagnostic
night increased significantly (p<0.001) to an average Sa,O2 of 93.35±1.71% and 93.19±2.9%
during CPAP and PPAP titration. Total sleep time, slow wave sleep and rapid
eye movement (REM) sleep increased significantly by the same amount
during both CPAP and PPAP titration (p<0.001), while sleep stage
nonrapid eye movement (NREM) 1 and 2 decreased. Six patients preferred
the PPAP titration night, four patients did not have a preference, and two
patients preferred CPAP.
The present data show that proportional positive airway pressure is as
effective as continuous positive airway pressure in eliminating obstructive
events and has the same immediate effect on sleep. The lower average mask
pressure during proportional positive airway pressure implies potential advantages
compared to continuous positive airway pressure. Proportional positive airway
pressure presents a new effective therapeutic approach to obstructive sleep
apnoea.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. M. Nolan, S. Ryan, T. M. O'Connor, and W. T. McNicholas Comparison of three auto-adjusting positive pressure devices in patients with sleep apnoea Eur. Respir. J., July 1, 2006; 28(1): 159 - 164. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. A. Harsch, S. P. Schahin, M. Radespiel-Troger, O. Weintz, H. Jahreiss, F. S. Fuchs, G. H. Wiest, E. G. Hahn, T. Lohmann, P. C. Konturek, et al. Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Treatment Rapidly Improves Insulin Sensitivity in Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., January 15, 2004; 169(2): 156 - 162. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Farre, J. Rigau, J. M. Montserrat, L. Buscemi, E. Ballester, and D. Navajas Static and Dynamic Upper Airway Obstruction in Sleep Apnea: Role of the Breathing Gas Properties Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., September 15, 2003; 168(6): 659 - 663. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |