ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Permissions
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lorino, A.
Right arrow Articles by Lorino, H
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lorino, A.
Right arrow Articles by Lorino, H
Eur Respir J 2000; 16: 928-932
Copyright © ERS Journals Ltd 2000


Clinical Trial

Effects of mandibular advancement on respiratory resistance

AM Lorino, M Maza, MP d'Ortho, A Coste, A Harf, and H Lorino

Mandibular advancing devices are proposed as nonsurgical treatment for certain patients with an obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome. Since they act by increasing the upper airway calibre, the aim of the present study was to investigate the changes in respiratory resistance (Rrs) resulting from mandibular advancement. Rrs was measured at the nose by the forced oscillation technique (4-32 Hz). Ten normal subjects were studied under three conditions: resting mandibular position, passive mandibular advancement steadied by a wax bite, and voluntary advancement, in random order. Respiratory resistance was extrapolated to 0 Hz (R0) and estimated at 16 Hz (R16) by linear regression analysis of respiratory resistive impedance versus frequency. R0 (mean+/-SEM=3.5+/-0.2 cmH2O x L(-1) x s in the resting position) decreased significantly with passive advancement (2.9+/-0.2 cmH2O x L(-1) x s, p<0.001), but remained unchanged with voluntary mandibular advancement (3.6+/-0.2 cmH2O x L(-1) s). Similar results were obtained for R16. The results of this study demonstrate that the effects of mandibular advancement on upper airway resistance differ, depending on whether advancement is passive or active, and suggest that in order to simulate the actual effects of therapeutic devices, mandibular advancement should be passive.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
K. Kairaitis, R. Stavrinou, R. Parikh, J. R. Wheatley, and T. C. Amis
Mandibular advancement decreases pressures in the tissues surrounding the upper airway in rabbits
J Appl Physiol, January 1, 2006; 100(1): 349 - 356.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
S. Tsuiki, A.A. Lowe, F.R. Almeida, N. Kawahata, and J.A. Fleetham
Effects of mandibular advancement on airway curvature and obstructive sleep apnoea severity
Eur. Respir. J., February 1, 2004; 23(2): 263 - 268.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the European Respiratory Society.