Oral and bronchial provocation tests with aspirin for diagnosis of aspirin-induced asthma

In 35 asthmatic patients with acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin; ASA) intolerance (AIA) and 15 asthmatics tolerating ASA well, the authors compared the diagnostic value of the placebo-controlled oral ASA versus inhaled L-lysine (L) ASA challenges. All AIA subjects gave a history of asthmatic attacks following ingestion of ASA and in all of them the intolerance was confirmed by oral challenge test over the past 10 yrs. Doses of ASA increasing in geometric progression were used in oral tests 10-312 mg (cumulative dose 500 mg); in bronchial tests 0.18-115 mg (cumulative dose 182 mg). Either challenge was considered as positive, if forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) dropped at least 20% from the baseline value and/or strong extrabronchial symptoms of intolerance occurred. Urinary leukotriene E4 excretion was determined at baseline and following the challenges. In 24 out of 35 patients the oral test was positive, based on a 20% decrease in FEV1. When including extrabronchial symptoms this was positive in 31 cases. Bronchial L-ASA challenge led to > or =20% fall FEV1 in 21 out of 35 cases, and in 27 cases when including extrabronchial symptoms. No correlation was observed between ASA provocative dose causing a 20% fall in FEV1, determined by the oral route compared to the inhalation route. Urinary LTE4 increased after both challenges the rise being higher following oral as compared to inhalation provocation (p=0.0001). It is concluded that both tests had similar specificity whilst the oral test showed a tendency to higher sensitivity for the clinical diagnosis of acetylsalicylic acid intolerance. The inclusion of extrabronchial symptoms into the criteria of test positivity enhanced the diagnostic value of both procedures. In both tests the highest leukotriene E4 increases were found in the presence of extrabronchial symptoms, suggesting the participation of tissues other than the lung in aspirin induced leukotriene E4 release to urine.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L Mastalerz, M Sanak, A Gawlewicz-Mroczka, A Gielicz, A Cmiel, and A Szczeklik Prostaglandin E2 systemic production in patients with asthma with and without aspirin hypersensitivity Thorax, January 1, 2008; 63(1): 27 - 34. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S.-H. Lee, T. Rhim, Y.-S. Choi, J.-W. Min, S.-H. Kim, S.-Y. Cho, Y.-K. Paik, and C.-S. Park Complement C3a and C4a Increased in Plasma of Patients with Aspirin-induced Asthma Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., February 15, 2006; 173(4): 370 - 378. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. I. Kidon, L. W. Kang, C. W. Chin, L. S. Hoon, Y. See, A. Goh, J. T. P. Lin, and O. M. Chay Early Presentation With Angioedema and Urticaria in Cross-reactive Hypersensitivity to Nonsteroidal Antiinflammatory Drugs Among Young, Asian, Atopic Children Pediatrics, November 1, 2005; 116(5): e675 - e680. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Jenkins, J. Costello, and L. Hodge Systematic review of prevalence of aspirin induced asthma and its implications for clinical practice BMJ, February 21, 2004; 328(7437): 434. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Antczak, P. Montuschi, S. Kharitonov, P. Gorski, and P. J. Barnes Increased Exhaled Cysteinyl-Leukotrienes and 8-Isoprostane in Aspirin-induced Asthma Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., August 1, 2002; 166(3): 301 - 306. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A J Knox How prevalent is aspirin induced asthma? Thorax, July 1, 2002; 57(7): 565 - 566. [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Szczeklik and E. Nizankowska Clinical features and diagnosis of aspirin induced asthma Thorax, October 1, 2000; 55(90002): 42S - 44. [Full Text]