ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Permissions
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tomalak, W
Right arrow Articles by Duvivier, C
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tomalak, W
Right arrow Articles by Duvivier, C
Eur Respir J 1998; 12: 1436-1441
Copyright © ERS Journals Ltd 1998


Original Articles

Variations in airways impedance during respiratory cycle derived from combined measurements of input and transfer impedances

W Tomalak, R Peslin, and C Duvivier

Simultaneous measurement of input (Zin) and transfer impedances (Ztr) allows separation of airway and tissue properties at a single frequency, without making assumptions concerning the structure of the two compartments. This approach offers the possibility of studying the variation in airway impedance (Zaw) during the respiratory cycle. Zin and Ztr were measured at frequencies of 10, 20, 30 and 40 Hz in eight healthy subjects to study the variations in Zaw according to a modification of the Rohrer's equation: X=K1+K2(V'ao)-K3V, where V is volume and V'ao the flow at the airway opening. The results showed that Zaw could be modelled as a simple resistance-inertance pathway. Variations in airway resistance (Raw) with flow were greater during expiration than during inspiration with K2 values varying from 0.76-0.90 hPa x s2 x L(-2) during inspiration and 0.84-1.47 hPa x s2 x L(-2) during expiration, independently of frequency. Raw was negative volume dependent; it decreased more with increasing volume during inspiration than during expiration. Airways inertance calculated from the imaginary part of Zaw also underwent systematic variations during the respiratory cycle, but, in contrast to Raw, flow dependence was negative during both phases. In conclusion, the approach used in this study allows flow and volume dependencies of airways mechanical properties to be studied and can also provide indices of airway patency independently of flow, which is of great potential interest for studying variations in airway resistance during bronchomotor tests.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the European Respiratory Society.