ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Permissions
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Simpson, J.
Right arrow Articles by Woodhead, M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Simpson, J.
Right arrow Articles by Woodhead, M
Eur Respir J 1998; 12: 1384-1387
Copyright © ERS Journals Ltd 1998


Original Articles

Do radiographic features of acute infection influence management of lower respiratory tract infections in the community?

JC Simpson, P Hulse, PM Taylor, and M Woodhead

Community-acquired lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) is a common clinical problem, and a chest radiograph is the most common investigation. This study investigated why general practitioners (GPs) request radiographs and whether radiographic features of LRTI affect management. The 12 month study included GP-requested chest radiographs performed at the Manchester Royal Infirmary. The GPs of patients with radiographic evidence of LRTI were sent a questionnaire. Radiographs (n=2,538) were performed in patients aged >15 yrs. One hundred and eleven (4.4%) chest radiographs showed evidence of LRTI, and 97 (87%) were included in the analysis. Fifty-six (62%) had their radiograph requested at the second or third visit. Forty-five (58%) radiographs were performed to confirm infection. In 47 (48%) of cases the GP felt the radiograph had affected treatment. An effect on treatment was significantly more common in patients not receiving antibiotics prior to the radiograph. Twenty-nine (32%) of GPs felt a normal radiograph would have affected management, most often with respect to antibiotic prescriptions (17 (58%)). Where the radiologist's report suggested a repeat radiograph or hospital referral, this was significantly more likely to have occurred. The commonest reason for a radiograph in patients with suspected lower respiratory tract infection is to confirm the infection. In the opinion of the general practitioner the results of the radiograph do affect patient treatment. The wording of the radiologists report is associated with patient management.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
A. M. Speets, A. W. Hoes, Y. van der Graaf, S. Kalmijn, A. P. E. Sachs, and W. P. Th. M. Mali
Chest radiography and pneumonia in primary care: diagnostic yield and consequences for patient management
Eur. Respir. J., November 1, 2006; 28(5): 933 - 938.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the European Respiratory Society.