ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Permissions
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ferrer, M
Right arrow Articles by Rodriguez-Roisin, R
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ferrer, M
Right arrow Articles by Rodriguez-Roisin, R
Eur Respir J 1998; 12: 1172-1176
Copyright © ERS Journals Ltd 1998


Original Articles

Assessment of ventilation-perfusion mismatching in mechanically ventilated patients

M Ferrer, E Zavala, O Diaz, J Roca, PD Wagner, and R Rodriguez-Roisin

The multiple inert gas elimination technique (MIGET) is a robust tool to assess both ventilation-perfusion (V'A/Q') distributions and the role of extrapulmonary factors determining arterial oxygenation during spontaneous breathing and in mechanically ventilated patients. Mixed expired gas sampling used in the MIGET is most often obtained from a 10-L mixing box (10L-MB) placed in the expiratory side of the ventilator circuit. Consequently, a considerable increase in the compression volume (Vc) would be expected which, in turn, can give rise to potential errors in the estimation of the effective tidal volume delivered to the patient. The effects of the 10L-MB on the Vc were compared with those produced by a newly designed 1-L, mixing box (IL-MB). At a given peak pressure (Ppeak) within the ventilator circuit, the Vc generated by the 10L-MB was about six-times higher than that produced by the 1L-MB. At a Ppeak =50 cmH2O, the Vc were 377 mL (10L-MB) and 67 mL (1L-MB) (p<0.001). In six patients, the mixed expired partial pressures of the six inert gases simultaneously collected from the two mixing boxes fell on the identity line. V'A/Q' distributions recovered using each of the two mixing boxes were equivalent. With the IL-MB, the effects of different positive end-expiratory pressure levels (0, 6 and 12 cmH2O) on Vc and arterial carbon dioxide tension were negligible. In conclusion, the new 1-L mixing box provides efficient gas mixing and substantially decreases the compression volume. It is, therefore, recommended when studies requiring mixed expired gas are performed in ventilated patients.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
M. MANCINI, E. ZAVALA, J. MANCEBO, C. FERNANDEZ, J. A. BARBERA, A. ROSSI, J. ROCA, and R. RODRIGUEZ-ROISIN
Mechanisms of Pulmonary Gas Exchange Improvement during a Protective Ventilatory Strategy in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., October 15, 2001; 164(8): 1448 - 1453.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the European Respiratory Society.