ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Permissions
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kohlhaufl, M
Right arrow Articles by Heyder, J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kohlhaufl, M
Right arrow Articles by Heyder, J
Eur Respir J 1998; 12: 793-798
Copyright © ERS Journals Ltd 1998


Clinical Trial

Diagnosis of emphysema in patients with chronic bronchitis: a new approach

M Kohlhaufl, P Brand, T Selzer, G Scheuch, T Meyer, N Weber, H Schulz, K Haussinger, and J Heyder

Aerosol-derived airway morphometry (ADAM) and aerosol bolus dispersion (D) are altered in patients or animal models with lung emphysema. This study was performed to examine the sensitivity and specificity of ADAM and D in the detection of emphysema in vivo compared with conventional lung function parameters. The study comprised patients with chronic obstructive bronchitis (COB) without emphysema (group COB; n=19, age 56+/-8 yrs, forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1)/vital capacity (VC) 66+/-12% predicted) and patients with chronic bronchitis with high-resolution computed tomography-confirmed emphysema (group COB-E; n=20), age 65+/-7 yrs, FEV1/VC 44+/-16% pred). Using monodisperse aerosol particles ADAM assessed the calibres of peripheral airspaces, while D measured convective gas mixing. Among all lung function parameters, ADAM and D showed the highest sensitivity and specificity for separating patients with COB from those with COB-E (area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (pROC) 0.99 and 1.0, respectively). In patients with COB aerosol parameters did not differ from those found in the control group, whereas patients with COB-E exhibited a two-fold increase in peripheral airspace dimensions compared with subjects with COB (0.86+/-0.07 versus 0.37+/-0.02 mm, p=0.0001) and an increase in D by >50% (541+/-74 versus 345+/-42 cm3, p=0.0001). In conclusion, aerosol-derived airway morphometry and aerosol bolus dispersion are powerful tools in the differential diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
S. B. Shaker, N. Maltbaek, P. Brand, S. Haeussermann, and A. Dirksen
Quantitative computed tomography and aerosol morphometry in COPD and {alpha}1-antitrypsin deficiency
Eur. Respir. J., January 1, 2005; 25(1): 23 - 30.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
M. KOHLHÄUFL, P. BRAND, C. ROCK, T. RADONS, G. SCHEUCH, T. MEYER, H. SCHULZ, K. J. PFEIFER, K. HÄUSSINGER, and J. HEYDER
Noninvasive Diagnosis of Emphysema . Aerosol Morphometry and Aerosol Bolus Dispersion in Comparison to HRCT
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., September 1, 1999; 160(3): 913 - 918.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
ChestHome page
P. Brand, M. Kohlhaufl, T. Meyer, T. Selzer, J. Heyder, and K. Hau{beta}inger
Aerosol-Derived Airway Morphometry and Aerosol Bolus Dispersion in Patients With Lung Fibrosis and Lung Emphysema
Chest, August 1, 1999; 116(2): 543 - 548.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the European Respiratory Society.